Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
04-12-2011, 03:26 PM   #1
Site Supporter
slip's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 2 hours north of toronto ontario canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,533
could someone please tell me what this is?

When I was cleaning my smc M135 f3.5 this fell out of the part of the lens that attaches to the body. No idea what it is for. anyone have any ideas what it is and if I need it?
It sits inside the mount of the lens (if that makes sense)
thanks



04-12-2011, 03:36 PM   #2
Veteran Member
borno's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: md-usa
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,580
Looks like a baffle to cut down on stray reflections.
04-12-2011, 03:38 PM   #3
Administrator
Site Webmaster
Adam's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arizona
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 43,189
Yup, that's exactly what it is. A lot of lenses have these (that don't have elements near the mount)..

Adam
PentaxForums.com Webmaster (Site Usage Guide | Site Help | My Photography)



PentaxForums.com's high server and development costs are user-supported. You can help cover those costs by donating. Or, buy your photo gear from our affiliates, Adorama, B&H Photo, or Topaz Labs, and get FREE Marketplace access - click here to see how! Trusted Pentax retailers:

04-12-2011, 03:43 PM   #4
Site Supporter
slip's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 2 hours north of toronto ontario canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,533
Original Poster
thanks guys. which angle does it go back in and does it cut some of the light so the lens won't be as fast?

thanks a million

cheers

04-12-2011, 03:52 PM   #5
Pentaxian
Lowell Goudge's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 15,400
The baffle has only one orientation to ensure the lens performs correctly and it attaches with a few small screws. You can go without it but may get some minor reflections off parts in the mirror box
04-12-2011, 03:55 PM   #6
Site Supporter
slip's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 2 hours north of toronto ontario canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,533
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by Lowell Goudge Quote
The baffle has only one orientation to ensure the lens performs correctly and it attaches with a few small screws. You can go without it but may get some minor reflections off parts in the mirror box
so buy mine coming off does that mean it is broken off?

thanks
04-12-2011, 05:49 PM   #7
Pentaxian
jimH's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Central Nebraska - USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,422
It shouldn't just fall off. I'm assuming that since it just fell off, that it's supposed to snap into the lens somehow. One thing you do need to give some attention to, is to make sure that it is aligned properly when you reinstall it. I'm thinking that the longer dimension should go across the top and the bottom of the lens to coincide with the orientation of the sensor. I have a Tamron 50-200 zoom that has that kind of baffle on the back of the lens. The orientation is as I previously described.
04-12-2011, 06:10 PM   #8
Pentaxian
Lowell Goudge's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 15,400
On my 300/4 this looks like it is part of the assembly with the flange that protects the aperture lever. It attaches by 3 screws through the side of the mount

04-12-2011, 08:40 PM   #9
Pentaxian
Just1MoreDave's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,862
I have at least six or seven photos of Pentax-M 135/3.5s that don't have a rectangular baffle. It looks like the K version to me, which looks like this:



The orange diamond above the aperture ring should end up at top center when the lens is mounted. The center of the long side of the rectangle should line up with the orange diamond. Don't worry that much about alignment. On APS-C, because the longest dimension of the sensor is the same as the shortest side of the film rectangle, you could be 90 degrees off and still OK.
04-12-2011, 09:55 PM   #10
Veteran Member
wasser's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: northern ca
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 427
QuoteOriginally posted by Just1MoreDave Quote
I have at least six or seven photos of Pentax-M 135/3.5s that don't have a rectangular baffle. It looks like the K version to me, which looks like this:



The orange diamond above the aperture ring should end up at top center when the lens is mounted. The center of the long side of the rectangle should line up with the orange diamond. Don't worry that much about alignment. On APS-C, because the longest dimension of the sensor is the same as the shortest side of the film rectangle, you could be 90 degrees off and still OK.
I was curious about this too. I have an M135 f3.5 and a K135 f2.5. Just as Dave stated, my M has no baffle, but the K does. It appears, as wheatfield said, that it may have been been simply cemented in.
04-12-2011, 10:07 PM   #11
Veteran Member
Wombat's Avatar

Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 901
To add to the plot, I have a K 200mm f4 which has an identical plate. It's cemented in (and is matte black).
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
k-mount, lens, pentax lens, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:00 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top