Originally posted by Rondec Nice review. Do you have any comments on border sharpness at longer focal lengths? This seemed to be the issue that Photozone found with this lens, but I don't sense nearly as much issue with it in your sample. Not sure of Klaus has a bad copy, or if you just can't see these sorts of things easily at web resolution.
Thanks.
I was really trying no to get mired in these 100% crops of everywhere as they are tedious to do and imo not the greatest criteria for a good photo
To me a photo is usually more 'happening' within the center/off-centre ('rule of thirds') area.
The eye naturally zones in on the interesting areas.
I almost always won't go nit-picking on the edge of the screen on any photo by anyone.
A BIG disclaimer before showing some of the crops. As mentioned before I never intended to do edge crops for my test shots.
As such my calendar test shots did not care much about perfect parallel alignment to the camera sensor, though I at least eye balled it.
The calendar is also the standing type, so it tapers at the top.
Therefore, I won't be surprised that some tilt/skew was present and the resultant loss in DOF may cause a further loss in edge sharpness.
So take these as reference with some pinch of salt.
Here they are from the 135mm f8 shot.
JPEG w/o sharpening and any PP.
Actual shot
Center for reference
Bottom left 1
Bottom left 2
Top right 1
Top right 2
Center for reference
If based on the photo in this case, the less sharp area would be perhaps the outer 1/8 of the photo.