Originally posted by ddhytz Someone said 28-135 was slightly softer wide open than 35-105. What are you comments except for extra reach? Any comparison shots of these two?
I used the 28/135 for several years, & I did not see any difference in image quality, but the extra range of the 28/135 was invaluable.....I used to do a lot of M/Sport stuff....I could do close up stuff in the pits, & a fair amount on the track with just this lens.
Ya don't hear a lot about the 28/135, but it is a SENSATIONAL lens....VERY expensive in its day, and very reasonable now.
Cheers, Pickles.