Originally posted by jstevewhite If you want to say "The best autofocus near-normal lens for an APS-c camera Pentax has ever made", I'll take it under consideration, because I don't own the lens. But "THE best prime Pentax has ever produced in an AutoFocus Lens" makes far too many assumptions and is unnecessarily hyperbolic. The FA31 isn't much use at all if what I really need for my purpose is a FA* 600mm f4, or if the 100mm 2.8 Macro is the Lens For Me. "Best lens" must include application.
I'm fond of the FA 35mm f2 AL; For sharpness, the 31LTD score 2345, the FA 35 AL scores 2336 (photozone.de and personal experience). The FA35 AL is noticeably sharper in the corners than the 31mm LTD at all apertures. The FA31LTD has slightly smoother bokeh, but I don't find the FA35AL's bokeh unpleasant. If sharpness is your goal in a near-normal, the FA35 f2 AL is a great deal.
Well let's not be ridiculous here. The FA*600 f4 isn't even in the same class as the FA31 or any other short prime. Neither is the 100mm f2.8. They all serve different purposes. As much as I would like to have an FA*600, just for the privilege of ownership, to me, it is a completely useless lens because it would never leave the house. Hell, I sold my Bigma because it never got used.
I don't care now, nor have I Ever cared, Nor will I Ever Care about Photozone. You've never seen me mention it here or anywhere else. Charting scores don't tell me anything about how my photos are going to look to me. I realize some people base their life on what PZ and other review sites say when it comes to lenses but I'll never be one of those people. I don't want to cast any aspersions here about PZ and those who hold it as gospel, I'm just saying, I'm not one of them.
Yes, The FA35 f2.0 is a decent lens, Optically. So is the FA50 f1.4. I've sold every copy of both of them I've ever had (2 and 4 respectively) because I didn't like the plasticy build quality.