Hi Barron, and welcome aboard. That is indeed an interesting pile of lenses you bought! I'll comment on some of them. For in-depth information on the Pentax-Asahi-Takumar lenses, see the review database here. And of course, the acid test for any lens is, DO YOU LIKE WHAT IT DOES? If you do, then other folks' opinions are irrelevant.
> 1.) Rexetar Auto Zoom Supercoated J/525 1:4.5 f=80-200mm
Too many old manual zooms, especially the no-names, just don't approach the quality of newer zooms. And many lensmakers churned out lenses that marketers named; tracking down the maker may be difficult. Rexatar is one such no-name brand, quite variable in quality; that's why I sold my two Rex primes, a 135/2.8 and 200/3.5. You *might* find this Rex zoom usable in good light -- try it and see.
> 2.) JCPenny Diamatic 1:3.5 f=200mm (screw mount)
I've seen 'Diamatic' on the no-name Accura brand, but a JCPenny Diamatic is new to me. JCPenny, Sears, K-Mart (Focal brand), and other stores bought various lenses from many makers, often from the same makers as Vivitar. These store-branded primes are often quite good. Again, try this one out.
I have a simple lens test: Aim it at a bright light that has straight edges nearby (shelves, standards, etc). Shoot, then chimp (review) the picture, zooming in. If I see wide colored fringes at those edges, I sell the lens. Narrow fringes are OK for me.
> takumar 1:3.5-4.5 28-80mm
> takumar-f zoom 1:3.5-4.5 28-80mm
> pentax smc f zoom 1:4-5.6 70-210
I can't really comment on these. See the lens review database. I will say that if those are SMC-F zooms, they are worth keeping -- or sell them for a good price!
> takumar bayonet 1:2.8 135mm
> 2.8 takumar 135mm
The Tak bayonet gets little respect, but it's still a pretty good lens when used right. Are you sure the other Tak 135 is f/2.8 and not f/2.5 or f/3.5? No Tak 135/2.8 shows up in the lens review database. All the screwmount Tak 135's are damn fine lenses, highly regarded.
> smc pentax-m 1:2 50mm asahi (x2)
> smc pentax-a 1:2 50mm
These are both very common, and also get little respect, because they're outclassed by the faster 50's. I have 3 M50/2's that just aren't worth selling yet. The A50/2 is in greater demand simply because A-type lenses are easier to use. But an A50/1.7 will SMOKE it!
> smc pentax-a 1.7 50mm (x2)
> super takumar 1:1.4 50mm (with double converter)
> Vivitar 28mm 1:2.5 Auto Wide-Angle
These are all SUPERLATIVE primes -- never let them go! Well, hang on to your extra A50/1.7 for a few months, and sell it for a high price. What brand is the 2X TC (leleconverter)? Try it and judge its results. Most 2X TC's give worse image quality than just cropping and enlarging the picture.
> tokina sd 70-210mm 1:4-5.6
> auto vivitar tele zoom 85-205mm 1:3.8
I can't really comment on these, except to say that zooms with a fixed maximum aperture (like the Rex f/4.5 and the Viv f/3.8) generally have better optics than zooms with floating max apertures (like the Tokina f/4-5.6). That is a generality; exceptions abound. Again, try them and see for yourself.
______________________________________
I've been in the lens trade on eBay for awhile, buying and selling glass so I can buy and sell yet MORE glass! Prices for old Asahi-Pentax lenses have spiked and show no signs of dropping. Even no-name Pentax-mount lenses have jumped in price. Whatever you decide to sell, you are not likely to lose money, as long as the lens is well-described. Have fun!
Last edited by RioRico; 06-06-2011 at 08:53 PM.