Originally posted by Pentaxor I also understand what paperbag is going thru for the cheapskate that he is, .
And proud of it!
But honestly, my 50 1.4 is a lens I really love, and I value what it offers above the 1.7s. I'm not really discussing this for my own benefit, but rather because I think it would be beneficial to the brand for newcommers. The 55 f1.8 was the first lens I bought after the kit, and it was quite the experience for me. It essentially taught me everything I now know about photography. I think that a 50 is a great place to start (yes, even on a crop body).
I bought a 50 on the suggestion of my friend, who does this for a living. I'm very happy I did, and unfortunately, it's not easy to find them around here for Pentax. Even on craigslist! Not the 1.7's, anyway.
I'm really trying to think through the eyes of someone who A) is not as computer savvy as I am, and B) is just starting and wants to build on the options afforded by the kit lens. The 50 is THE lens that gives you the most for your dollar. The kit is 5.6 at 50mm, even a cheap 50 is f2. The kit is soft at 50mm, even a cheap prime at 50mm is sharp. It would be smaller, etc.
It's also perfect for shooting people, which is the thing those who are new to DSLRs seem to have a common interest in. The 35 is a really great lens and a welcome addition, but a cheap 50mm would really be attractive to newcommers, if you ask me
.