Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
08-29-2011, 07:01 PM   #46
Veteran Member
DanielT74's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Australia
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,377
QuoteOriginally posted by RayGunn Quote
Hi Daniel…

I just don’t get what your agenda is, Daniel.

RayGunn
Actually, there is no agenda, just your run-of-the-mill LBA coupled with a curiosity to try out this legendary beast and to pit it against some other macros I already own.

This is usually (in me) accompanied by an opposing voice (of reason or my wife's) saying that I don't really need this lens and all the other reasons not to buy it.

Is it just me?

My offer was genuine and it stands. I thought it was you who was pulling out, but this is fine - no hard feelings over this at all. You did say US shipping only.

I disagree that people who buy a lens like this must have money to burn. I have a modest wage, a mortgage and a large family to support. If I bought it, it would be in the hope that I could recover most of my money selling it on a year later or so.


Last edited by DanielT74; 08-29-2011 at 07:19 PM.
08-29-2011, 07:48 PM   #47
Senior Member




Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 198
QuoteOriginally posted by DanielT74 Quote
... no hard feelings over this at all.
I agree, Daniel.
RayGunn
08-29-2011, 09:22 PM   #48
Veteran Member
yeatzee's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Temecula
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,675
QuoteOriginally posted by DanielT74 Quote
Yes, the Leica is 1:2, but how often do we really need to get closer?
QuoteOriginally posted by Digitalis Quote
you should ask that question to yeatzee.
I would just give up on macro photography if I was limited to 1:2

I present you with this (courtesy of orionmystery.blogspot)



To show the rather large jumps between different magnifications, as well as this (which directly corresponds with your "question")


*1:2


*1:1



Quite a large gap




*(macro 1:2 vs 1:1 - Canon Digital Photography Forums)
08-29-2011, 09:58 PM   #49
Veteran Member
DanielT74's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Australia
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,377
Thanks, yeatzee. Of course it depends on what we shoot. I find that I hardly ever go closer than 1:2 but this is of course not true for everyone. Nice to have the illustration. Might be an interesting poll to see how many people who shoot macro go closer than 1:2.

08-30-2011, 03:19 AM   #50
Pentaxian
Digitalis's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Adelaide.
Posts: 8,796
QuoteOriginally posted by DanielT74 Quote
The fact is that Leica build is tested by time and Cosina Voigtlander isn't yet (to the same extent). It may well prove to be excellent I don't know. We shall see.
If it is properly looked after a takumar from the 1970s will be perfectly usable these days, and significant number of lenses from that era are perfectly usable on current DSLR cameras.The pentax FA limited and to some extent the DA limited lenses are all very well built and will last for decades. I have no reservations over the construction quality of Cosina/Voigtlander SLR lenses, they remind me of using some of the older classic glass I still use for personal projects. For instance the Cosina/Zeiss planar 50mm f/1.4 is significantly more robust and studier than the current Nikkor AF-S 50mm f/1.4G - the optical quality is quite comparable.
09-13-2011, 11:35 AM   #51
New Member




Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1
QuoteOriginally posted by dcmsox2004 Quote
got me scratchin' my bald dome.... i'd love (kill) for the 125, but not for 2150 bucks... as an amateur shooter... it would beyond lba... it'd be outright lens lunacy...
when is too much, TOO much?? hope these new 125 owners get a lotta mileage to make these beauties a worthwhile investment....
2000 bucks is peanuts compared to this:
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Voigtlander-Macro-APO-lanthar-125mm-2-5-Pentax-Mount-/170644701136

AU $3,050.00 is more than 3000 USD

Last edited by pentax75; 09-13-2011 at 03:04 PM. Reason: wrong link
09-14-2011, 02:51 PM   #52
Veteran Member
xjjohnno's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Melbourne Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,115
OMFG, $3000+ for an Apo Lanthar 125, buyers are going bonkers. That's well over double what I paid for mine late last year.
Daniel, If I were looking for one now I'd cap my prepared to pay price at around $1700 if mint, with hood and box. I'd no doubt be waiting a while but then value is in the eyes of the beholder.
09-14-2011, 03:04 PM   #53
Veteran Member
ManuH's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montreal
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,209
I'd like to have the Voigt 125, but at this price, I would prefer to get a Pentax 200mm f/4 macro.

09-14-2011, 05:43 PM   #54
Pentaxian
Digitalis's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Adelaide.
Posts: 8,796
QuoteOriginally posted by ManuH Quote
I would prefer to get a Pentax 200mm f/4 macro.
I have seen some of those sell for $3000 before - but I suppose you also get AF and [IF] optics to sweeten the deal.
09-14-2011, 11:10 PM   #55
Veteran Member
Asahiflex's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,754
I think it's also the Apo-Lanthar name.. I once bought the much sought-after Bessa II folding 6x9 camera with Apo-Lanthar lens for EUR 250, and sold it for US$ 7,000 (that's not a typo).
09-15-2011, 01:14 AM   #56
Pentaxian
Digitalis's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Adelaide.
Posts: 8,796
QuoteOriginally posted by Asahiflex Quote
I think it's also the Apo-Lanthar name
Funny thing is the Lanthar is based on one of the oldest lens designs in history - the heliar. The Lanthar is a Drop-kick variant of the heliar design which can be adapted for use on SLR cameras - a symmetrical Heliar lens would have to be too close to the film/sensor to have sufficient clearance for the reflex mirror. The Bessa II with the 10.5,15,21 and 30cm APO-Lanthar lenses were designed in 1952 and released a few years later - and they are the first genuine Apochromatic lenses designed for medium format - though they are said to have an image circle capable of covering 4X5 format - sans movements.
09-15-2011, 01:59 AM   #57
Senior Member




Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Zhukovsky,Russia / SF Bay Area
Posts: 236
Btw, there is Voigtlander 75mm f2.5 Heliar lens for SLR, including Pentax.
Voigtländer Color-Heliar 2.5/75

There are samples in Voigtlander club here, looks good
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
k-mount, pentax lens, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A 100mm F4.0 for $125?? jajajab Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 4 02-28-2011 01:33 AM
So, another choice... DA40mm vs F28mm vs Voigt 40mm herzzreh Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 9 01-06-2010 01:25 PM
DA 40mm and Raynox 125 ivoire Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 4 09-08-2009 06:12 AM
K7 battery - $125 or $12 ? Spock Pentax DSLR Discussion 13 08-25-2009 05:40 AM
Butterflies and flowers: Voigt 180 at work Zav Post Your Photos! 6 07-16-2009 11:32 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:21 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top