Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
09-04-2011, 08:38 AM   #1
Veteran Member
mde1970's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Reading
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 310
Pentax DA 16-45 vrs Tamron AF 17-50

Hi,

I'm looking for a wide (ish) lens as the kit lens with my K-m has developed a fault. Current contenders in my budget are the Pentax 16-45 or the Tamron 17-50.

Searching the Lens database the Pentax has some very good reviews but so does the Tamron. The Pentax is quite a bit older (2003 I think) and can still find them going for about 250 online (new) while I can pickup the Tamron for approx 300 in a local camera shop.

So far I think the Tamron may be a better buy due to the larger appature range (2.8 - 32) but would apprechiate any advise :-)

cheers for any replies.

mark

09-04-2011, 08:52 AM   #2
Pentaxian
JinDesu's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New York City
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 5,626
Generally the Tamron is considered sharper, better than even the 16-50.
09-04-2011, 09:24 AM   #3
Site Supporter
K57XR's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 828
I had the DA16-45 for a while before replacing it with the Tamron 17-50 f2.8 because I wanted a faster lens in this focal range....I don't miss the 16-45 at all. DA*16-50 is too expensive for my taste and wasn’t really an option. IQ of the 16-45 is quite impressive and definitely outperforms my 18-55mm; however, the Tammy is in a different league altogether in comparison and some reviews I've read even put it ahead of the 16-50 in terms of IQ. (I cannot comment on that since I don't have experience with the DA*) The only thing about the 17-50 is it tends to underexpose, although this shouldn't be much of an issue if you shoot RAW. Both are great values for their respective price range.

Between the two you mentioned, if it’s within your budget I’d say go for the Tamron. Hope this helps!
09-04-2011, 12:02 PM   #4
Senior Member




Join Date: May 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 197
If the store has a few copies of the Tamron, ask to test them all on your K-m body before buying as this lens sometimes has front/back focus issues.
Once you find a 'better' copy that focuses best with your body, you'll enjoy a very sharp/fast lens compared to your old kit lens.

Michel

09-04-2011, 12:13 PM   #5
Veteran Member
mde1970's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Reading
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 310
Original Poster
Cheers all for the replies. Looks like a unanimous verdict, so the Tamron it is.
09-04-2011, 09:44 PM   #6
Veteran Member




Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,352
+1 for the Tammy.

I got the non-VC version as the camera can take care of that, plus it's smaller, lighter and cheaper.

Only 195 new here in Hong Kong:

Tamron SP AF17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical [IF] (A16) - Lens ?? - ???? - ????? Price.com.hk
09-05-2011, 09:28 AM   #7
New Member




Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3
Tamron has good image quality, and better border performance (my copy seems OK). Sharp, and it has F2.8. If you manage to get one, you won't be disappointed!
09-05-2011, 08:11 PM   #8
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Oregon
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,418
I have not used the Pentax, but am quite impressed with the Tamron 17-50. It has as good IQ as many of my prime lenses at similar focal length.

11-19-2012, 01:14 AM   #9
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Manila
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,190
Good thing this thread came up, I want to ask, for those who have had experience with both lenses, which lens renders colors better/more accurately? Thanks in advance!
11-19-2012, 02:19 AM   #10
Veteran Member
kent's Avatar

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lithuania
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 344
16-45 is impressive in terms of IQ. However 2.8 is 2.8 and extra 5mm is advantage.
11-19-2012, 02:51 AM   #11
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Manila
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,190
QuoteOriginally posted by kent Quote
16-45 is impressive in terms of IQ. However 2.8 is 2.8 and extra 5mm is advantage.
The prob I've been hearing about the Tamron are issues of front/back focusing. Are these issues that common? Or are these issues body-dependent?
Because so far every AF 2.8 lens or higher has back-focused on my K-x.... especially in low light (it gets further back the less ambient light there is)
11-19-2012, 08:04 AM   #12
Veteran Member
msatlas's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 309
My Tamron 17-50 required a -5 AF fine adjustment on my K-r. When I had a K-x, I thought the lens was a dud because I could never get sharp results. So on a body without AF fine adjustment you may be gambling a bit.
11-19-2012, 08:13 AM   #13
Site Supporter
Malsi's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Elancourt (close to Versailles)
Posts: 230
Hi,

+1 for the Tamron definitely ! Just be carefull. The tamron, even new, can suffer from an important back or front focus. If you have the possibility, take a copy with warranty. If not, test it.

Regards.

Malsi
11-19-2012, 08:35 AM   #14
Loyal Site Supporter
pacerr's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Henry, TN
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,910
I've replaced my DA 16-45 with a Tamron SP AF 17-35/f2.8-4 (A05). Does everything the DA 16-45 did with faster aperture and the benefits of using a FF lens.

It can sometimes be found new at half the price of a new AF 17-50 or a used DA 16-45. For me, it's a perfect fit between the SP AF 10-24 and the SP AF 28-75 for rural landscapes.

H2
11-19-2012, 09:02 PM   #15
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Manila
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,190
Guess I'd have to try to see for myself... but it seems I'll be picking the Tamron this time.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
k-mount, lens, pentax, pentax da, pentax lens, slr lens, tamron
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 not as fast (bright) as Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 on Pentax K-x, PICS Edgar_in_Indy Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 38 01-10-2011 04:09 PM
For Sale - Sold: Tamron 90mm, Tamron 18-250mm, Pentax AF-540 Flash jumbuc Sold Items 5 04-21-2010 12:49 PM
For Sale - Sold: Pentax K100d + 18-55mm + Tamron 70-300mm; Tamron 90mm Macro jake123 Sold Items 4 11-09-2009 12:51 PM
M vrs. SM lenses in AV mode (K200D) c a sugg Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 4 08-03-2009 06:36 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:03 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top