Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
09-08-2011, 03:54 PM   #1
Inactive Account




Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6
Pentax SMC Takumar 135mm 2.5 6 element version

I've been looking for a good copy of this lens for awhile now and its come to my understanding that the 6 element version is the best. But how do you know if it is a 6 element version? I'm currently eyeing one up on ebay: http://www.ebay.ie/itm/150642555356?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649

Does anyone know if this version is the 6 element one or the 5 element one?

09-08-2011, 04:57 PM   #2
Giveaway winner!
MysteryOnion's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: beantown
Photos: Albums
Posts: 934
I remember reading that the second version has a wider DOF scale than the first. Also, that the observable color of the coating of the first is blue and the second is green.

take a look from this person's flickr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ebelbeb/5691359204/
09-08-2011, 05:34 PM   #3
Veteran Member




Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 800
That's some price to pay though. McBain Camera in Red Deer, AB, Canada has one for $49.99 Canadian. But, I do not know if that is a 5 or 6 element.
09-08-2011, 05:50 PM   #4
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: May 2010
Location: melbourne
Posts: 934
Easiest way to check is to examine the model number stamped on the A/M switch....6 element is 43812, 5 element is 43802.
Cheers, Pickles.

09-08-2011, 05:59 PM   #5
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Ohio (formerly SF Bay Area)
Posts: 1,491
In addition to what pickles said, the OLD (5-element) version has "30m" as the highest metric distance on the focus scale, while the NEW (6-element) version has "35m".

And per MysteryOnion, on the OLD version the DOF scale says "22168 81622" while the NEW version has "22 16 8 4 8 16 22"

You can see both of these features in M.O.'s linked photo.
09-08-2011, 06:00 PM   #6
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Deep Forest
Posts: 630
Camera side of Auto-Man switch is a number. 43802 is first version, 43812 is second version. I am unable to discern which number from photo posted in auction. Ask the seller!

Here is photo of second version:

09-08-2011, 06:42 PM   #7
New Member




Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Shah Alam
Posts: 9
Looking at the aperture scale in the picture from ebay, i think it is the 5 element version.
09-08-2011, 07:39 PM   #8
New Member




Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Auckland
Posts: 2
See the orange diamond as opposed to a '4'... that's definitely the 5 element version.

09-08-2011, 08:22 PM   #9
Pentaxian
Just1MoreDave's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,879
QuoteOriginally posted by calculator01 Quote
That's some price to pay though. McBain Camera in Red Deer, AB, Canada has one for $49.99 Canadian. But, I do not know if that is a 5 or 6 element.
The 5-element version is definitely worth that, for a lens you'll use. I've had both side by side, and the differences are not that big. That's about the price for a Super-Takumar, same formula but the older coatings.
09-08-2011, 09:14 PM   #10
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Deep Forest
Posts: 630
I've used both versions. The differences are similar to differences between S-M-C 1:1.9/85 and S-M-C 1:1.8/85 -- the first version of both 85 and 135 is soft wide open, maybe better for portraiture, while the second version of both is brutally sharp from wide open, and closing down only get sharper. I would say the first version is average, but he second version of S-M-C 135 is one of the finest 135s ever produced during film era. The Nikkor 135/2 (manual focus) may be a little better, the jury is still out on that. The modern Zeiss T* 135/2, Nikkor AF 135/2, and Canon 135/2 L are #1, #2, and #3 best 135s available.

That BIN price is okay for the second version, but way too high for the first...
09-09-2011, 11:50 AM   #11
Inactive Account




Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6
Original Poster
Thanks for all the replies guys. Its definitely the first version. Dodged a bullet on this one.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
element, k-mount, pentax lens, pentax smc takumar, slr lens, smc takumar 135mm, version
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
is this Takumar 50mm 1.4 the old 8 element version? WA-surfer Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 5 02-10-2011 08:40 PM
Takumar 135mm 2.5 K mount version? Abstract Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 8 01-23-2011 05:21 PM
For Sale - Sold: Super Takumar 50mm f1.4 (8 element version) buzzvic Sold Items 4 10-19-2010 07:54 AM
For Sale - Sold: SMC Takumar 135mm F2.5 (Rare Version) iunknown Sold Items 11 08-07-2008 05:06 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:15 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top