Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
10-06-2011, 04:56 AM   #1
Senior Member




Join Date: Sep 2010
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 228
Pentax 50-135mm vs Sigma 70-200

Hi guys,

I'm about to buy a tele-lens and would like some suggestions choosing. Heard a lot of great things about the 50-135mm and 60-250, but 60-250 is not in stock in my country. Also heard good things about the Sigma but there's 2 versions, the macro and the OS, the macro being much cheaper.

What is the main difference between the 2 different Sigma and how do they compare to the 50-135mm? Thinking of getting a used 50-135mm but the SDM issue makes me have second thoughts...

Would be great if someone can point me in the right direction.

10-06-2011, 06:03 AM   #2
Veteran Member




Join Date: May 2009
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 2,869
Both are nice lenses - the 50-135mm SDM appears to be more reliable than the 16-50mm has been. I have owned mine for 2.5 years, used it only on occasion over the past year or so and have had no problems with it.

The 70-200mm is a significantly larger lens (almost 2x the size/weight if memory serves). If you get the sigma, I would go for one with their HSM focusing, as it is extremely fast, much faster than Pentax's SDM focus.

Sigma throws around the term Macro pretty loosely, so I wouldn't let that designation sway your decision.

In the end the focal range and speed of the 50-135mm make it an excellent portrait and outdoor enthusiast lens (being fully weather sealed). The 70-200mm from sigma I would categorize as a sports/action lens. Depending on your need from those two situations would probably be the best way to determine which lens you should buy.
10-06-2011, 09:12 AM   #3
Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gladys, Virginia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 16,230
The difference really is in size (Sigma is bigger obviously) and whether you think you would want a little more length versus 20mm on the wide end. I have used the Sigma 70-200 HSM (non-OS). It is sharp -- a little soft at the long end, but gets better at f4. Still, for my type of shooting, the 50-135 is definitely the better lens. In particular I like the fact that it is more than a little smaller and sealed.

I guess I should add that HSM is quite a bit faster, although in practice both lenses are adequate to focus in most situations.
10-06-2011, 03:01 PM   #4
axl
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nove Zamky, Slovakia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,181
I have had 50-135 and Tamron 70-200.
The DA* is much smaller and lighter than the 70-200. Uses smaller filters too. SDM could be faster but for 90% of normal real life shooting it's OK. Lately I haven't heard much about 50-135 problems...
IQ wise the 50-135 is fantastic. The best zoom I've tried only rivaled by the FA*28-70 I'm just getting to know.

Conclusion, if you don't need superfast AF and like walking/ being outdoors a lot in all kind of weather then the smaller, lighter and WRed DA* makes perfect sense. And (for me at least) the 50-135 range just makes a lot more sense on APSC than 70-200.

My 2p

10-06-2011, 07:24 PM   #5
Pentaxian




Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,921
Hard decision.
50-135 are very nice and used focal lengths for most photographic needs. Not too big and heavy and WR too.
70-200 is also a nice range of focal lengths, but sometimes more on the long side of things and 200mm may or may not get used as often depending on user preference.


There is really no right or wrong in the choice, just preference of usable focal lengths lens and how it combines with existing lenses as a complete set.
Eg.
16-50; 50-135
16-50; 70-200 (the in-between is not that important)
10-06-2011, 08:23 PM   #6
Senior Member




Join Date: Sep 2010
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 228
Original Poster
Well, I'm leaning towards to the 50-135 right now for the following reasons:

It's lighter and smaller
Cheaper
Like the shorter range more than the longer range, I like shooting landscapes and rarely shoot wildlife or birds.

Here's my setup so far:
Pentax 15mm
Sigma 17-70mm
Pentax 35mm f2.4
Tamron 90mm macro

Looking for a tele now for a upcoming trip to scenic areas in Jiuzhaigou and Zhangjiajie in China~
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
50-135mm, k-mount, macro, pentax lens, sigma, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sigma 70-200 2.8 (NON-HSM) + Sigma/Kenko/Pentax TC? sergysergy Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 4 08-08-2011 03:31 PM
For Sale - Sold: Tak 105mm 2.8, Tamron 135mm 2.8, Sigma 70-210mm AF, Lowepro SlingShot 200 AW logic14 Sold Items 8 03-02-2010 08:54 AM
Sigma 70-200/2.8 MkII or Pentax FA*80-200 ? huqedato Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 25 07-14-2008 09:49 AM
Pentax 50-200 vs. Sigma 28-200 (vs. Tamron 70-300) shefaet Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 7 11-24-2007 10:44 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:56 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top