Originally posted by wolfiegirl hehehe. unfortunately the helios i've been eyeing has just tipped over my budget. Considering it's similar kind've specs to the Pentax M 1.7 I think I'll sit it out. There's always gonna be another one out there somewhere, right?
Yes, there's always another. But the M50/1.7 and Helios-44 58/2 (Sonnar design) are entirely different lenses, really! Different specs and FOV, and very different rendering and bokeh. I roughly distinguish them as: the M50/1.7 is for shooting people, or shooting things as people; the Helios-44 is for shooting things, or shooting people as things. Does that make sense? They just give different 'looks' to images.
And they make me move in different ways. There's a joke (or is it?) that the Soviets had zillions of Helios-44s churned out, favoring its 58mm vs the more common 50mm standard lenses on Western cameras, either 1) to let comrades shoot tighter, more intimate pictures, or 2) to force comrades to STAY BACK further from subjects. In practice, I choose different distances and angles and subjects with each lens. They're both must-haves. Thus sayeth I. Selah!