Hey philoslothical,
I have a k100d. The lowest ISO setting is 400. And that's where it pretty much stays permanently. I shoot the manual lenses on Av. I prefer it to manual coz I haven't figured out all the controls yet, and so far the pictures are turning out (relatively) good. The pics I was taking of the puppies were wide shots, not close ups (I couldn't get too close without Elsie getting up and ruining the pose she was doing) in morning sun, and even at -2.0 her fur was all washed out. When I tried to fix it in PP the colours went darker but her white patches just blanked out altogether with no definition
I think i have to take it back about what I said re the F 28-80 zoom. I know it gets a bad rap here, and I probably believed in some of what I was reading too. But I took it out for a quick spin this morning before work and the pictures look good. Gosh I love auto focus. It's making me think maybe that's what I should invest in, instead of the manuals....
I just get so many more 'good' shots with the AF than I do with the manuals. Of course using AF also feels like cheating now that I've learnt how to do the manual focus. Can't win, can I? Although if I get the AF I can always flip the switch to MF right? hrmm.... thinking, thinking, thinking...