Originally posted by Finn Actually, the DA40 WILL work with a 35mm-sized sensor because it is the same design as the old M 40mm.
I wondered about that, its probably the same optical construction in terms of what glass goes where. But clearly the DA40 is worlds sharper than the old M40. But I can confirm that the DA40 works on a film body. However it needs to be a film body that has electronic contacts (Kaf) and the camera must be able to allow you to manually input an aperture from the camera itself, as you don't have an aperture ring. It seems plenty of the electronic film cameras cut cost on the body by pretty much assuming it would be redundant to offer any other means to control a lens aside from the aperture ring. As such it seems the PZ series and newer (the SF-1 wouldn't work and some others I tried) will work with the DA40 without worry that it'll always stop down to f/22 whenever you fire a shot.
The other lens definitely will vignette, tried a 16-45, you could clearly see the fall off at 16 to 20, though not as noticeable in the viewfinder at around 21-22. It is at least however a softer falloff than say other brands of lens designed for digital, such as the Tamron Di-II, or the Canon EF-s which will have a much sharper circle outline at any focal length, since the back element is cut to size as well. Being designed for digital also means that even if you start reducing the vignetting, the edge sharpness and quality might suffer greatly as they had no reason to design it for crisp edge to edge on the whole surface of the glass.
But looking at the lens line up, I can't imagine a full frame variation is in the market any time soon for pentax, but for the film lovers theres always the FA and older mounts, at least they're the only company that makes DSLR with the best backward compatibility across all of its models. Myself if I got another DA lens it would be strictly for the digital, otherwise I'll concentrate on FA lens as I do plan on getting a better film body.