Originally posted by Michaelina2 My 28mm adventure took this path: M42 28/2.8 --> M 28/2.0 --> F 28/2.8... If I had it to do over again, I'd go for the F 28/2.8 and tip-toe past the temptation to fuss with the rest. Don't read this wrong... the others are excellent... even dazzling... I have no regrets, but the F version - for the money - is the most versatile and satisfying to use ... read the reviews in this forum... It took some time to find one, but the wait was worth it.
Cheers...
I second the recommendation; it's a great lens and probably worth the current price.
Originally posted by Lowell Goudge While I don't disagree that perhaps an AF lens would be worthwhile, I suspect the OP might be looking for something older and less expensive.
If you add up all my 28mm lenses, the total cost is something like $100, that is for the M28/2.8, the sigma mini wide 28/2.8(KA mount), an M42 Vivitar 28/2.5, a K mount Vivitar 28/2.5, the Tamron 28/2.5 in KA mount, and A Kiron 28/2.
...
The lenses that impress the most for the cost (~$10 each) are the vivitar 28/2.5 lenses.
The Vivitar 28/2.5, that's the Kiron/Kino one with the 67mm filter? I somehow resisted buying that one, but they seem very common. I did have the Tokina-made TX mount one, 58mm filter, and it wasn't very impressive. For the TX/T4, like the Adaptalls, the adapters can drive the total price beyond other options.