Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
12-06-2011, 09:50 PM   #31
Loyal Site Supporter
Canada_Rockies's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sparwood, BC, Canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 9,535
I'm quite happy with my DA* 16-50. DxO removes 90% of the down side optically. I love the f/2.8. My personal kit lens with the K10 was the DA 12-24. Optically, my DA* 50-135 was nothing short of superb. Mechanically, well the SDM broke for the third time and out of warranty.

12-07-2011, 12:50 PM   #32
Pentaxian
Marc Sabatella's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 10,686
QuoteOriginally posted by TooLoose Quote
Ah, but I did my 'homework.' The problem with your statement is...there are so many different opinions on just about everything in the world. Some praise this lens.
Indeed. And some praise the kit lens. It's tough to sort through opinions to get anysort of truth, especially about a subjective quality like image quality. But for the record, objective tests show the 18-135 to not be s significant optical improvement over the kit lens. On the other hand, you obviously gain more "reach", plus the WR and the silent focusing. So I think it a worthy upgrade overall if you don't mind the significant increase in cost or in weight.
12-07-2011, 12:56 PM   #33
Pentaxian
Marc Sabatella's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 10,686
QuoteOriginally posted by TooLoose Quote
(re: primes) Won't be happening...I am on a very tight budget.
Precisely one of the reason many prefer primes, though. Especially if you are willing to consider manual primes at some focal lengths. You can often put together a prime line up for less money - *definitely* less weight, for Pentax anyhow - than the equivalent zoom lineup. Not there aren't other reasons to consider zooms. But it's somewhat of a myth to assume the zoom option is going to cheaper, except in the case of slow consumer zooms (eg, the 18-135). Then it's not really a fair comparison, because the primes would be much faster. It's more if you start wanting f/2.8 zooms - and getting into the telephoto range - that the primes can start looking better and better.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
k-mount, k5, lens, lenses, pentax lens, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do m42 lenses measure up to todays lenses? Vantage-Point Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 25 05-14-2011 07:51 AM
Huge test on the influence of fungus in lenses (on 9 lenses) CarbonR Photographic Technique 18 03-14-2011 10:34 PM
For Sale - Sold: (3) Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm lenses + 3 Pentax lenses JP_Seattle Sold Items 13 04-23-2010 03:10 PM
Pentax Km and old manual lenses: SMC Takumars & Tamron Adaptall 2 lenses Kendrick Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 10 04-14-2010 03:23 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:40 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top