Originally posted by tux08902 I just won this on eBay for $50. Why is the f2.8 version rated lower than the f3.5 version? I'd assume it would be the other way around because the f2.8 is actually a faster lens. Am I wrong?
The image quality of the 3.5 is superior. I purchased one brand new from London Drugs in Aldergrove BC for a whole $109.95 in the mid 70's. Almost no distortion, the "Pentax Look" - great lens. My daughter in law has it on permanent loan, along with my ME and an AF280T flash. I don't think I'll ever get it back.