Originally posted by SoC1Bar I was kind of under the impression that a bayonet mount was a bayonet mount but now I wonder...
This is an FYI:
Each make has its own proprietary bayonet(s) -- Canon has had two, the EOS and the FD. The FD wasn't even really a bayonet, but a BREECH mount. With a bayonet, you twist the lens onto the mount. With a breech, you twist a ring around the lens base. Other breech mounts probably exist(ed) but I'm too lazy to look that up now.
Some bayonets are very very similar. Nikon is the same size as Pentax PK and some Nikon lenses can be force-fit mounted on PK without modification. Others (like Olympus OM and Contax-Yashica C/Y) are *almost* the same size, but their bayonet blades are slightly too thick to fit under PK mounting lugs. I shave those, tapering the flags slightly so they'll force-fit.
Other mounts (Konika KAR, Minolta M/MD, Pentacon PB) are almost the same size but their lens register is too short for infinity focus on a PK cam. Yet other mounts (like Petri) are just similar-but-different enough that the lens base can be removed and replaced with a PK mount. The Exakta mount is fun: glue an M39-M42 adapter ring around the Exakta bayonet, and use a cheap M42-PK adapter that's been ground-down (sandpapered) so it's about 0.6mm thinner.
No, a bayonet is not a bayonet is not a bayonet. Life could be so much easier...