Originally posted by interested_observer It might help answering a couple of questions....
- What are you going to take pictures of? Interiors, exteriors, architecture, landscapes, citiscapes, Walkaround, Street views, or ?
- What do you want the lens to do for you?
- Do you want auto focusing or are willing to consider manual focusing?
- Auto aperture or are you willing to consider manual aperture lenses?
- Are you leaning towards primes or zooms?
- How fast - faster than f2.8 or can it be slower?
- Does size and weight matter? Pocketable?
- Best image quality - or better than what you currently have?
[*]What are you going to take pictures of? Interiors, exteriors, architecture, landscapes, citiscapes, Walkaround, Street views, or ?
Street views and walkaround describes me pretty well
[*]What do you want the lens to do for you?
Basically I want something that takes pictures as well or better than the 50 1.4 but isn't as long as the 50, a lot of times I find myself wishing the 50 was a tad wider.
[*]Do you want auto focusing or are willing to consider manual focusing?
I need autofocus
[*]Auto aperture or are you willing to consider manual aperture lenses?
auto aperture
[*]Are you leaning towards primes or zooms?
I don't mind either as long as the IQ is there... However, there's something really appealing about the limited primes... if I only wanted good zooms I would have gone Nikon or Canon..
[*]How fast - faster than f2.8 or can it be slower?
2.8 or faster...
[*]Does size and weight matter? Pocketable?
Nope.. as long as it fits inside my bag I'm cool with it..
[*]Best image quality - or better than what you currently have?
Best IQ...