Originally posted by abacus07 both lenses have their place in someone's kit. the M100/4 is perfect because it is small and light and easy to travel with while the Tamron has 1:1 mag and 1 more stop.
the M100/4 is the only lens on my planned to buy list. but my wishlist is pretty long and I've started desiring expensive ones. M85 (or DA70/FA77), K28/2, Tamron 28-75, K5, FA43(upgrade). yikes...
thanks for helping me justify abacus
i think in my case the 52b(b?) isn't 1:1 until I get the extension tube and the teleconverter? i can't remember. *fails the tamron addict test*
i'm going overseas in a few months on a trip around the mediterranean and after a 'healthy discussion' with wolfie boy yesterday he's thrown a spanner in the works ("we are not taking your lens collection with us" *grumbles*), which means i am now eyeing either an 18-250 tammy or some derivative of (the important thing is that it needs to start 18 and ends past 50). i checked out the 18-135 WR that everyone's been raving about but that price bracket is SO not going to happen. Unfortunately wolfie boy doesn't agree with me re the lens acquisition: "the answer isn't to buy another lens" he says..
(we only talked about it in my vain hope that i could get the cash out from the joint account)
either way both the 18-250 and the 17-70 lenses are out of my budget ($50 or less) so it means i'm going to have to up it, depending on how bad teh LBA gets.