Originally posted by Dewman The first photo was taken standing at the bottom of the tree while my friend, Dave retrieved his falcon. It was shot at full 135mm. The second was the same image, only severely cropped. I was amazed at the sharpness after cropping! I've read some pretty dreadful reviews of this lens.... but, I'm not sure what else a person could want! Did I just happen to get an exceptional copy.... or are most all of them this good?
Great image Dewman. Hey, I'd like to see more shots of the falcon too if you got some.
I'm with you about the value of the extra reach over the xx-50, xx-70 and xx-80/85 zooms. Saves a lot of lens changes or very heavy cropping. In the 24 years I spent lugging 28-85 and 70-210 zooms with my old film SLR, I missed countless shots by having the wrong lens on. If someone had said, "how would you like a single lens that gives you the same range of FOV and better IQ for only 450 grams, a cost per shot of close to zero, and the capacity to provide images fit for publication?", I would have thought it was a dream.
Our resident pair of Grey Shrike-Thrush fledged four chicks this year. Here's a couple of shots of the chicks. The little wing movement you can see in the second one is the chick fluttering as it begs for food (successfully in this instance).