Originally posted by zeitlos btw. I just saw that you're living in Bavaria. That's were I live, too. If you should happen to live more or less in my area maybe there's a change to meet so you can at least test the FA77 (and the FA43 and Sigma 85mm 1.4) with your camera if you want. Well, just a spontaneous idea if you feel like testing
That's fantastic! I live in Bamberg, however I won't be back until spring '13 - currently in Afghanistan. But when I return, we will definitely have to get together, and hopefully I have some lenses that you have been wanting to test drive. And the beer will be on me
Originally posted by Zaphodmonster Hope these help man!
Those are EXACTLY what I have been looking for. I have NEVER come across any comparisons between the two, and also none of the 55's with hoods on and reversed, which for some reason I feared was not possible. Thank you so much. And it also made me realize - the 55 is extremely compact as well. Realistically, it's not much bigger than the 77. At least to me, it isn't...
Originally posted by audiobomber > DA* 16-50 I DA* 50-135 I DA* 60-250 I DA 55-300 I DA 100mm Macro WR I Sigma 8-16 Nice collection. You have portrait length well covered. Portrait length doesn't need super thin DOF, f/2.8 is shallow enough. What's missing for me in your kit is a fast normal, for low light shooting indoors. The 16-50 is soft wide open, and f/2.8 is not fast enough in some circumstances. My clear choice given your kit would be an f/2 lens, between 28 and 35mm. Something that's sharp wide open, like the FA 35 or FA 31.
Thank you very much - it has taken me a lot to acquire the lineup I currently have, and I am extremely proud of all the lenses - I have no qualms about using any of them - they are all gems in their own right. I really think you are onto something with the suggestion of a normal FL...
Originally posted by sjwaldron My real suggestion, like someone else already said, was to pick up something around 24-35mm. That would give you a normal focal length and would be the best all-rounder lens. Why Pentax has never released a DA* prime in that range I can't fathom.
I'm starting to lean towards a normal FL. I don't know either - it is seriously lacking.
Originally posted by sjwaldron My main point is that the DA* line is a set of lenses with unique properties such as a rugged exterior, advanced WR, and SDM. From my experience with the 55mm and 300mm, they also have a certain rendering to them that varies a bit to the other lines of lenses. I agree with you. I think a FF capable DA* 24mm lens should have been in the lineup. The other lenses in the line just don't fill that role a DA* would fill even if focal lengths were close.
And that is
exactly what I am looking for -
the durability and outstanding build quality of the DA * series. Agreed - the role is not just in the FL, but the total character of the lens.
And this is why I came to my next possible idea - the Sigma 30mm f/1.4. I just checked Tamron, and they don't offer anything in that FL that fast, however I think the 30 f/1.4 is what I would be most in need of.
I am most definitely leaning towards the 55 (although it's expensive as hell! I will probably try to find a slightly used copy for ~ $600 - I found one for ~550 that I regret not jumping on). The Sigma 30 1.4 (because I can't justify the cost of the 31 ltd) started to grab my attention. It's just I don't know anything about its build quality (I don't understand why Sigma has an EX line that is their "pro line of high quality optics" and only a miniscule fraction have weather sealing), and I'm a bit angry at Sigma for once again neglecting Pentax by making it the only mount they offer that doesn't have HSM. For the same price, Canon and Nikon have HSM focusing, and to me, this is absolutely unacceptable and terrible business practice.
Gripes aside, what are your thoughts on the Sigma 30 f/1.4 if you have had any experience on it.
Much appreciated everyone!
-Heie