Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
07-22-2012, 07:50 PM   #1
Junior Member




Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 47
Pentax lens pricing dilemma

What the heck is going on?
Last year I finally bit the bullet and went digital.
My film gear is Minolta from their classic years.
An XD-11.
Bought a K-5. Love the camera.
Built a kit around the "three amigos".
With the addition of the 14mm, 55mm and 100mm macro.
Was about to go all the way with the 50-135mm and a 300mm.
Only to see the prices had doubled.
Now I check B&H and the prices are back to "normal".
Did Pentax experience a reality check?
Will these prices last?
Do I go for the last two lenses I would ever need?
CRAP!
help

07-22-2012, 11:22 PM   #2
Site Supporter




Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,892
Pentax has been demanding 'minimum' pricing from retailers lately.

It was implemented on April fool's day and wasn't a joke. By all accounts pentax lens sales dropped to almost nothing, and the lens prices seemed to have stabilized, more or less, back at the old prices.

If you can swing it and you know you'll eventually purchase those two lenses, I'd purchase them now.

If you have trouble swinging the price then I wouldn't worry too much about it. I think Pentax knows that they'd be hurting the brand with another wild swing of prices.
07-22-2012, 11:29 PM   #3
Senior Member
Kryscendo's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 223
Yeah man, the 50-135 and the 16-50 DA* lenses are back down to what I paid for them last year. Things have been brought back down.
07-23-2012, 02:01 AM   #4
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern California
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,181
Yes, if you need them, you should certainly get them. There are times you'll need the DA*50-135 even though you have the excellent 55mm, 77mm, and 100mm macro lenses.

The DA*300 is nice too, of course. I'm unaware of any changes happening there, so buying it would be good if you can use it. It (or even the 200mm, but I'd probably opt for the 300mm) could easily become a favorite. But you may also need to consider the DA*16-50 at some point. It was virtually the last lens I got, but it was needed on top of my primes and helped me stop buying any more lenses. However, you may have the luxury of waiting for the updated version which Pentax is creating according to the lens roadmap. Although I'm happy with it, I think it could still use some improvements, so I'm glad Pentax is doing an update.


Keep in mind there's a high likelihood Pentax will come out with a Full Frame camera next year - next Spring looks probable. All the lenses you have or are looking to buy reportedly work on Full Frame, except for the DA14 and DA*50-135. But those two are so essential you need them now anyway. And you may not even go Full Frame. If you don't, a DA10-17FE and (updated) DA*16-50 may be in your future as well.


Last edited by DSims; 07-23-2012 at 02:10 AM.
07-23-2012, 01:42 PM   #5
Junior Member




Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 47
Original Poster
Thanks for the reassuring responses.


Unfortunately I can’t afford them right now.
Other priorities got in the way.
And when I saw the ridiculous price increase I forgot about it.
But one dreams – we all have wish-lists.
I forgot, I also have the 18-55mm WR kit lens.
I bought it as a party/pub knock-about lens.
Not a bad lens, but not up there with the others.
I like the idea of an updated DA*16-50mm.
The bad press turned me off it.
Maybe I’ll add it to the wish-list.
Damn, another 3 grand in lenses.
Oh well…the price of fun.

About FF…
I had considered that.
Either Sony or Nikon.
I have never liked Canon.
Then I discovered the K-5.
I had been hung up on FF.
But now I could spread my budget around on lenses as well.
And have a premium body.
08-12-2012, 11:13 AM   #6
Inactive Account




Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: long island ny
Posts: 31
I had the DA*50-135 and DA*16-50. Sold both and would not recommend them. Way over priced and unreliable. You can find better for much less money. read some of the reviews compared to sigma a tamron.
08-12-2012, 11:49 AM   #7
Pentaxian
thibs's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Photos: Albums
Posts: 5,161
No way, the 50-135 is an optical gem. Slow AF, for sure. But optically, a gem !
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
check, k-mount, pentax, pentax lens, prices, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon 40mm Pancake: Okay, Pentax, time to wake up on lens pricing! mattdm Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 136 07-05-2012 12:52 PM
Pentax K-r Lens Dilemma StephenA Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 10 02-01-2012 05:57 AM
Pentax K 50mm F/1.2 lens hood dilemma yeatzee Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 18 08-18-2010 07:36 AM
no pricing of pentax lens in B&H catalog cyy47 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 4 11-05-2009 09:19 PM
Dilemma: Pentax K-7 or Pentax K20d+wide angle lens? skawi Pentax DSLR Discussion 12 07-10-2009 07:59 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:14 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top