Originally posted by Lowell Goudge I think you need to have a reality check on what you are asking, because it makes no sense at all
Agree, not to be rude, everyone is entitled to an opinion, but that business plan is a recipe for disaster, IMHO.
Pentax already has a two tier lens line up, in zooms you have the DA and DA L models as tier one and the DA* as tier two. In primes they have only had tier two for awhile with the Limited lenses (not counting the FA 50 f/1.4). They are now adding the tier one line with the DA 35mm f/2.4 and the DA 50mm f/1.8.
No question Pentax needs to up their game on many fronts, camera, lenses, flash and support but asking for things like :
Originally posted by V'cuz a more accurate and quieter screw drive mechanism
to be just pulled out of a hat is not cost effective. If Pentax does not have the resources that Canon and Nikon do to maintain multiple lenses where are they going to find the resources to upgrade all of their existing lenses? And who is going pay for lenses that suddenly cost even more? I know you said "at reasonable cost" but if you add seals and tighter tolerances, and bigger apertures that WILL increase the cost.