I would only negotiate price for an item I wanted to buy... I'm not into negotiating for others on the forum, which is what suggesting that they lower their price would amount to. After all in any private sale, it's expected the asking price may not be the final price. Usually the seller puts out what he'd like to get for the item, the buyer puts out what he'd like to pay. They come to some kind of agreement, possibly a sale, possibly an agreement that that they are too far apart and no sale is going to be possible.
I have all kinds of issues with level of the prices asked... because I know if I wait for a sale, I'll get it cheaper at one of the on-line stores I shop at. If an item is in perfect condition but used, in my mind it's worth at max 3/4 of the lowest new price I've seen for it. Most of the items I've bought have been closer to 60%. But I'm not going to argue that with anyone, especially not in a thread where they want to sell something. My feeling is, I'd really rather buy new anyway, it annoys me when I find something I want at a price I can't refuse. Others are more comfortable with used equipment, even happy to find something used , and save a couple hundred bucks. I find the whole second hand thing unpalitable. Others find it invigorating. To each his own. And as others have pointed out, often there is someone out there who will pay what you ask, if you wait long enough.
There was a guy by the highway selling apples. His sign said "Apples , one million dollars". Someone stopped and said "Isn't your price kind of high?" He said , "ya, but I only have to sell one."
So a lot of the prices I see both on Ebay and here I think... "Ya, but he only has to sell one."
But then, if you only have one to sell, there's no point in selling it as a loss leader.
Last edited by normhead; 08-10-2012 at 05:41 AM.