Originally posted by kiteman I think that DA 21 mm to close to my DA 15 and that FA 35 f/2 to close to my 40 mm xs. The Sigma 30 mm looks like good deal, but ratings in Photozone are so,so. Do I pull trigger on the Sigma or live with my DA 16-45 f/4 which is not near as fast. Could look for 28 mm used, but see one at KEH for $315.????????????
Love your comments about needing another lens, and another, and another
.
I await ALL your knowledge, and I know that you are loven it cause not your $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
Thanks
PS------- Do some of you do this full time on here?
Get the Sigma.
I'm a big fan of Photozone myself, but I don't take their word as Gospel. The Sig showed some exceptional center resolution, which is probably more in accordance with how it was meant to be used. Also, remember that he was kind of comparing the Sigma against the FA 31 which costs triple the amount.
I want to add that I did at one point have the DA 35 F2.4, but I returned it because I didn't like the field of view. I felt it was too narrow. My "perfect" all around focal length I estimate would be somewhere between 24-28mm, but no one makes anything AF super fast (< f2) for Pentax in that range (Sigma makes a 24 1.8, but it's old and rare). 30mm is the closest I'll get. Just my experience. Some people swear by the 35mm range in APS-C, so it's really just a personal thing.
By the way, I think the Sigma deal expires today. I'm not sure you can experience the world of F1.4 in autofocus for less than that price.
Also, some of us just have boring jobs, so we like to browse forums during the day (when we're not "working" of course).