Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
01-24-2013, 08:28 AM   #1
Veteran Member

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 373
Tamron 17-50/2.8 or...

My parents bought me the Tamron 17-50/2.8 for Christmas. I had to REM due to the lens having a bad focusing problem that in camera fine adjustments couldn't fix. My new copy should arrive at my parents' house tomorrow afternoon and my dad will ship it to me at school. Hopefully I'll have it back by middle of next week

If the second copy of this lens is showing bad signs of focusing issues as well, I'm considering returning it to B&H and just getting the $500 credit and grabbing something else. My question is: What should this something else be, if I do decide to do this? I've been wanting to make the switch to primes for a while now, and am considering picking up 2 primes with the $500 credit. Would the DA-L 35/2.4 and the DA 50/1.8 be a good choice for this? I was considering grabbing the 35/2.4 with some of my own money I've earned as a wedding photographer assistant.

I like having the range of 17-50 available, and would likely still keep my 18-55 on hand for that reason, but I really am in need of something faster and sharper than what the kit lens can offer me. From what I've seen, both the 35/2.4 and 50/1.8 have great sharpness, and definitely are much faster than the 18-55. What are some other options I could consider staying with this $500 budget?

My main needs are:

1. Basic cataloging of events (Low light lectures, concerts, events, etc.)
2. Portraits
3. Children

01-24-2013, 09:27 AM   #2

Join Date: Nov 2011
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,735
Why not wait and see how the new copy of the Tammy works out?

I've used mine a lot on the K-x, which doesn't have any official BF/FF adjustment.
For critical focusing, I found that contrast detect AF in live view, slow as it is, really hits the spot.

Another trick is to focus at 50mm, and then zoom out.

When you get it focused, it's a great lens.
01-24-2013, 09:29 AM   #3
Veteran Member

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 373
Original Poster
Yea, I'm definitely giving the new Tammy a try. I've heard great things about the lens, and from seeing how sharp my old copy was when focusing in live view, I really would like this one to work out! I still might snag the DA-L 35/2.4 just to have a solid prime to play around with. I'll let y'all know how the new copy turns out next week after I have a chance to play around with it.
01-24-2013, 09:56 AM   #4
Loyal Site Supporter
THoog's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: North Carolina
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,486
The Tamron 17-50/2.8 is a little quirky. I've had focus issues with it on my K-r as well, but I had no problems with the same lens on a K100D. I didn't have problems with the K-r and other lenses. When I switched the focus mode on the K-r to AF.S, the problems pretty much went away. AF.A was almost always choosing AF.C (continuous), and AF.C was guessing wrong. Just something you might want to try.

01-24-2013, 10:54 AM   #5
Veteran Member
kaiserz's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NoVa The "burg"
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 899
I've never had a chance to play with the tam 17 - 50 2.8 but I do have the cheaper 28 - 75 2.8 that I use for events, it's the only zoom that I have in my arsenal, and the only reason I use it is because of how versatile it is. I'm a prime shooter myself, but doing events with a prime lens is quite a pain. Anyway the 35 2.4 is a good cheap prime; it's sharp and is a wonderful lens, I had one before but I ended-up selling it. I never had the chance to play with the 50 1.8, but seeing the reviews, and testimonials from other users, I would not hesitate to get it(And I love how that it has the rounded aperture blades, for those round bokeh highlights).
01-24-2013, 01:09 PM   #6

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern California
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,181
Your stated needs sound like a good match for the FA77. Too bad it's a bit more expensive, though!

You could consider a Samyang/Bower/Rokinon 85/1.4 plus a DA35/2.4.

However, you eventually want to have a fast zoom as well. I built up a good collection of primes first, and I'm glad I did it that way. But in retrospect, I waited a little too long to add the DA*16-50 (purchased at the used price, of course). After you get a quality zoom you won't feel an urgent need to fill in all the focal lengths with primes.
01-24-2013, 01:16 PM   #7
Veteran Member

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 373
Original Poster
I'm not a huge fan of manual focus, honestly. I can't see very well through the K-r's viewfinder. The image seems kind of dim and I can't tell very well if it's in focus or not. My keeper rate with my ST 55/1.8 is probably like 10%.

The FA77 is a dream of mine to own. Maybe one day!

  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
copy, credit, events, k-mount, lens, parents, pentax lens, primes, slr lens, tamron
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tamron 17-50 2.8 to Sigma 17-50 2.8: Should I make the jump? johnnie518 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 9 12-29-2012 02:38 PM
Tamron 28-75 (2.8) or 17-50 (2.8) davieFL Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 9 06-08-2011 08:57 PM
DA*16-50, Tamron 17-50 2.8, or Sigma 18-50 2.8 for Weddings efkelly Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 15 01-25-2010 05:42 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:48 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]