Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
05-02-2013, 10:09 PM   #1
Junior Member




Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 38
Is it worth it to get a 16-45mm?

I am still very much a noob to this great hobby but I have been struck with LBA and have purchased within the last few months seven lenses for my k5 II:

Pentax M28 f/3.5
Pentax M50 f/1.7
Pentax M50 f/2 (package deal with the 1.7)
Pentax M75 - 150 f/3.5 zoom
Tamron SP Di 90 f/2.8 macro (I am really looking forward to trying this when the snow finally melts)
Pentax M135 f/3.5
Vivitar p/K,M 2x teleconverter/macro (just for the heck of it and the price was right at $20)

These are in addition to the Pentax FA 28 - 80 f/3.5 - 5.6 and Pentax FA 80 - 320 f/4.5 - 5.6 zooms that I already had from a previous camera (MZ-7).

Would it be worth buying a Pentax 16 - 45 f/4 zoom? Would the M28 be wide enough for landscape? Am I spinning out of control?

The price isn't too bad at $180 Cad for the lens, a UV filter and a Hoya polarizer but I was wondering if I was already pretty well covered for wider shots. I know that this is a subjective question but I was wondering what other people thought.

05-02-2013, 11:07 PM   #2
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Slovenia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,174
Get it. 16mm is a lot wider than anything on your list.
05-02-2013, 11:28 PM   #3
Site Supporter
jatrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,716
You do not really have anything wide. 28mm is your widest and that is not wide. You also have no modern glaass, which is nice to use sometimes. So yeah , get it.
05-02-2013, 11:43 PM   #4
Pentaxian
calsan's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,386
At that price, yes. Is it new??? It was about $450 before. A poor quality polariser would be at least $25 alone, so it's a good price.
It's in run out pricing in Australia at $249.

I wouldn't be able to cope with your lens line up. I need wide 90% of the time. So you have my permission to buy it.

05-03-2013, 01:15 AM   #5
Senior Member
drugal's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Detroit suburbs
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 257
The 16-45 is my only standard zoom and I highly recommend it. As others have said, you need a wide angle. A 28mm on APS-C is a 'normal' lens.
05-03-2013, 01:23 AM   #6
Forum Member




Join Date: Oct 2011
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 94
Get it, the 16-45 is IMHO the best value among DA zoom lenses along with the 55-300.

I've owned Tamron and Sigma's 17-50, as well as Pentax's own DA* 16-50, and sold them all as the 16-45 still was my favourite !

I'm sure that you'll like it, and that you will find yourself shooting at 16mm most of the time !
05-03-2013, 02:28 AM   #7
Junior Member




Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Coast NSW, Australia
Posts: 33
I'm with the others, the DA 16-45mm is one of Pentax's best value lenses, a lot of performance for the money.
05-03-2013, 02:48 AM   #8
Site Supporter
p38arover's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Western Sydney, Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,078
Is it worth buying compared with the kit DA 18-55mm AL WR (of which i have 3 examples)?

05-03-2013, 04:53 AM   #9
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Slovenia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,174
As declared by popular vote, you are ordered to acquire the Pentax SMC DA 16-45 f/4 .
05-03-2013, 06:25 AM   #10
Senior Member
dboeren's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Marietta, GA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 148
For that kind of price, I'd buy it whether you want it or not - you can always resell it for a profit if you don't like it. You really do need something wider than 28mm though.
05-03-2013, 07:56 AM - 1 Like   #11
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,434
or you could get the da 15 limited and really corrupt yourself on high quality glass

it will put most of your other lenses to shame forcing you to sell them and start over again with FA and DA* lenses

that's what happened to me
05-03-2013, 08:00 AM   #12
Loyal Site Supporter
Canada_Rockies's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sparwood, BC, Canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 9,399
The only thing my DA*16-50 has that the DA 16-45 has not is weather sealing and an extra 5 mm long end. 16mm is the wide to get. Go for it. My favourite go to film lens is the FA 24-90 - which is why I got 16mm (16*1.5 = 24) at the wide end. You will use it.
05-03-2013, 08:01 AM   #13
Site Supporter
Checking...jono's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northeastern Minnesota
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 716
I got a good deal at $200 and I have never regretted it. The 16-45 is usually on my camera unless the weather is really crappy, then I go to the 18-55 WR. I like the extra width (yes, 2mm makes a difference) and the IQ is pretty good for a relatively inexpensive lens. You can't go wrong.
05-03-2013, 10:59 AM   #14
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jul 2009
Photos: Albums
Posts: 371
Not like you haven't heard it before, but get it.

I loved mine and now regret selling it. A great performer, wonderful colors, and 16 is wider than you think.
05-03-2013, 11:31 AM   #15
Veteran Member
EarlVonTapia's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vancouver
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,150
As a previous owner of the DA 16-45, I can recommend it.

Its performance at 16mm is astounding given its price point. The rest of the focal length range is basically just a bonus.

My only issue with it was that it was a pretty dainty lens compared to some of its other long-barreled zoom counterparts. There was just a bit too much wobble for me, and I don't really baby my lenses so I lived in constant fear that even a slight bump would cause some sort of horrible focus misalignment.

But at $180, you can't go wrong with it.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
f/3.5, fa, k-mount, m28, m50, pentax, pentax lens, price, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DA* 16-50: Is it worth it? enoxatnep Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 30 01-29-2012 11:31 AM
is it worth it to get $20 warranty? atomic Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 12 12-14-2011 08:29 AM
Is it worth it to get the k-5, or will the k-x do?? Moz Artistic Visionz Pentax DSLR Discussion 19 10-03-2011 06:34 PM
selling 16-45mm and 55-300 mm & getting 18-135 is it worth it? nirVaan Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 19 08-09-2011 04:46 PM
Is it worth to sell my two kit for a DA 16-45mm?? telly0050 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 17 08-02-2011 05:19 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:53 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top