Originally posted by Cannikin I've owned the FA 31 for quite some time, and it's one of my favorite lenses, but it's far from perfect. There are plenty of obvious ways it can be improved.
For instance, mechanically it would really benefit by adding Quick Shift, better AF and a better designed hood (preferably removeable, or at least retractable). Optically, it has a fair bit of purple fringing and longitudinal CA ("bokeh fringing"), which become pretty obvious when shooting wide open (necessary for shallow DOF) in high contrast conditions, even when viewed at normal sizes. In all these ways the Sigma 35 has a distinct advantage over the FA 31.
If Pentax could address these issues I mentioned, and add WR, making a DFA 31, that would make it a near-perfect lens. Oh and release a FF camera to mount it on.
I won't deny that you are right and note that I was being "somewhat" simplistic. I forget that people don't know me here anymore. ;-)
CA, long CA, and fringing exist in all the FA Limiteds, worst of all with the FA77. It sure would be good to get rid of those, but I can only imagine the price then! Plus the lens would be gigantic I am sure.
I agree the hood is bizarre.
But some of your points are a matter of personal preference. For example, I have never felt the need for Quick Shift since I can switch to manual focus quickly anyway. Better AF is not a property of the lens, I don't think. In any case, I would want the opposite... a lens with better manual focus handling (like a Zeiss or Tak) even if this meant AF disappeared entirely.
I would also give up some things for the lens to be smaller, and wouldn't want WR for that and aesthetic reasons. Only zooms need weather-proofing IMO. Does anyone need to shoot a special-purpose prime in the pouring rain? I bet it would survive anyway.
All things considered, there is still no equal to it.
Besides, surely the number one way in which the FA31 could be improved would be to offer it for $100!
Last edited by rparmar; 06-03-2013 at 04:05 PM.