Originally posted by Arvid
so much for the moral dilemma. very smooth move to buy it in a package for 130 €, now sell it for 400 €..
I didn't actually buy it with the intention of selling it, I just picked out those lenses that looked the most interesting until my wallet ran dry.
I'll definitely keep the Kiron 24/2, the Tokina 17/3.5 and the Soligor 17/4, I'm not sure about the Zenitar 16/2.8.
I'll probably use the proceeds on a FA77, so in my deluded mind I'm not making profit, I'm just swapping lenses.
(btw: I sold it to an art student who's into portraits, so it's in better hands now)
The moral dilemma is about what to do next. The most self-serving strategy would be to pick out the best bargains, sell them off and use the profits to repeat the process. The most altruistic approach would be to offer my help for free but the proceeds wouldn't exactly be going to charity (most goes to the uninterested family, some goes to the astronomy club).
I have settled on B* as a compromise, any profit I get will come from the extra profit they would not get without my help.
Since I'll be essentially in charge of pricing, most will probably be sold at relatively cheap prices to speed up the sale. After all, there are probably not too many people who are looking specifically for an Arsat-B 30mm f/3.5 Fisheye (Pentacon-6, 5 identical lenses and still counting...).
Originally posted by rparmar
If you have to ask, you are looking for justification, not the ethical decision. ;-)
I guess I'm looking for a justifiable compromise between profit and ethics. (By the way, is the
Pedophilic Catholic Church still selling indulgences?)