Originally posted by Kozlok Picture C is obviously taken at a longer FL than the others since the background objects appear larger relative to the subject-3 fence slats fit in the frame vs. 5 with the others. Therefore it must be the 50-135.
B is the kit lens because it is the picture with the slowest aperture. The other two are shot with too shallow of a DOF to be the kit.
That leaves A for the 43.
Adam is correct.
Given that the images were made with inconsistent framing, at different focal lengths and different apertures, with unstated parameters such as whether a tripod was used, the point of the comparison escapes me.
According to the EXIF data, A was made with the 43 at f/2.8 1/2000. B was at 42.5mm, which would be the kit lens, f/8 1/250. C would have to be the 50-135 at 95mm, f/5.6, 1/500.
Under the circumstances any comparative comments about bokeh are meaningless.