Originally posted by David&karen Erd, my apoligies, i did not.read far enough back,
Not a problem. Forget it.
Bad luck is bad luck. No lens is failure-proof and one, or a small few, doesn't make it failure-prone. Of the 5 Pentax zooms with AF motors built in, The least likely to fail, by a clear margin is the 18-135. The second least likely being the 60-250.
David, yes, you were the unlucky one whose 18-135 died, but at least you got 13 months use out of your lens and then a full refund. I feel for Dragonlord who forked out probably 1300 or 1400 bucks for a brand new lens in, what, early July(?), only to have had virtually zero use from it in the subsequent 4 months up to this point. That's really unfortunate and quite frankly ridiculous.
Dragonlord: You mentioned that with the latest lens the SDM was fine. Did you choose to have the decentering repaired rather than have the lens replaced because you didn't want to risk a fourth lens having the SDM issue?