Originally posted by Corto-PA I might just go for something with a max of 200mm instead, I like the compact size of those.
Like the Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di-II Macro Lens AF014P-700 B&H
I gave long answers before, but here's my short answer:
An $1100 camera is certainly worthy of a $500 lens. You'd be better off getting the FA 135 (even if you have to buy it on eBay - which *hint* you
can right now (I don't know the seller but it looks good)) than blowing $200 on any of these cheap zooms. Of course I don't know how much you were planning to "blow" on primes, but I think it's better to put the money toward something that will work well. It's a desirable lens, so you can sell it after the season if need be. You might get away with a cheap zoom for soccer - with lots of lateral motion - but not when someone's running at you full speed!