Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
10-17-2013, 08:28 PM   #1
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tumbleweed, Arizona
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,707
My Small / Lite Prime Kit

I have been somewhat going after a set of primes over the last 5 years, that are physically small and lite weight, however have an excellent blend of sharpness, overall IQ, resolution, character and color. Individually there may be some minor weaknesses (in some reviews), but for me - I think that they work together rather well. The goal was to have everything fit in the Pentax Limited lens case - Interior Dimensions 11.25 x 2.0 x 2.5" (28.6 x 5.1 x 6.4 cm). I don't have the case yet, but I think that everything will fit - we will see. It may be a tad tight and maybe only really fit 4 of the 5. But I have been thinking about this on and off for quite a while.
  • Voigtlander 20mm f 3.5 Color Skopar
  • Contax Zeiss 28mm f2.8 Distagon
  • Pentax 31mm f1.8 Limited
  • Pentax SMC A 50mm f1.7
  • Contax Zeiss 85mm f2.8 Sonnar
I wanted to go from as wide as possible (given small and lite) to really no longer than 85mm. Beyond that the physical size just grows. I also wanted some what fast apertures, but no real hard requirements. I think that the apertures are good for me - as I usually shoot off a tripod in low ambient light, with the lowest ISO and mostly let the shutter speed float to where ever it has to go.

This set concentrates on somewhat the wider end of things - but not too terribly wide. Any wider and the lens size really balloons up. These are also all full frame lenses. Who knows what may happen or if a full frame body may or not be released. I don't even know if I'll ever be interested or even be able to afford it, or if it will be physically too large for what I want to carry. But I have the option - and in the mean time they all shoot great on an APS. They are all wonderful lenses, small and light that I can just take in a single small case.

All I am interested in now is to wander around and shoot some interesting images.



10-17-2013, 09:31 PM   #2
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
jatrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Washington Cascades
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 12,992
  • DA 21mm Limited f/3.2
  • F 28mm f/2.8
  • DA 40mm Limited f/2.8
  • F 50mm f/1.7
  • DA 70 mm Limited f/2.4
I would also have the DFA 100mm f/2.8 but it would not fit in the Limited case
10-17-2013, 09:38 PM   #3
Pentaxian
pixie's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: California
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 873
Being a minimalist, I've had the same sort of idea for the last few years. I don't care about putting all my lenses in a single case, though. Slowly I have managed to acquire the following lenses (the hope of one day getting a digital FF Pentax camera being a factor):

A 20mm f2.8
FA 31mm f1.8
FA 50mm f1.4
FA 77mm f1.8

This set plus the DA 15mm Ltd is what I have on my K-5, and I am very happy with the focal range and speed. I just wish I could get out more to shoot with these beauties.
10-17-2013, 09:47 PM   #4
Pentaxian
jimr-pdx's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: now 1 hour north of PDX
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,897
I was going with 15/24/40/50/70 for a while. I then got a great deal on a DA16-45 that kinda threw me off but so far I've kept the 40 and 70 active. They deserve the time!

10-18-2013, 12:34 AM   #5
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2012
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 696
A Pentax 35mm f/2.4, which is sharper then both my Pentax 16-45mm and my Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8.

Keep it on my K-01 for walkaround photography; leave a bag with the 16-45mm and a 55-300mm in the truck. Using the 28mm with a reversing ring for closeup photography these days.
10-18-2013, 12:51 AM   #6
Moderator
Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Sandy Hancock's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Adelaide Hills, South Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 11,275
I reckon DA21 / DA40 / DA70 / DFA100WR is hard to beat. All take 49mm filters and all are remarkably small for what they offer. Throw in the DA15 if you want a APS-C superwide. Pack them with the K-01 and you're set.

Although I owned the DA40 and DA70 for a while, I opted for the FA43 and FA77 instead for improved speed and a little extra pixie dust. I have left the FA31 out because it is a little big, and the filter size is wrong.
10-18-2013, 01:41 AM   #7
Veteran Member
kh1234567890's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Manchester, UK
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,653
QuoteOriginally posted by interested_observer Quote
I wanted to go from as wide as possible (given small and lite) to really no longer than 85mm. Beyond that the physical size just grows.
Since you seem OK with manual lenses you might also like the Pentax M135/3.5 which is about as small as you can get in telephotos.

10-18-2013, 05:21 AM   #8
Pentaxian




Join Date: Nov 2011
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,310
QuoteOriginally posted by interested_observer Quote
I have been somewhat going after a set of primes over the last 5 years, that are physically small and lite weight, however have an excellent blend of sharpness, overall IQ, resolution, character and color.
  • Contax Zeiss 28mm f2.8 Distagon
  • Pentax 31mm f1.8 Limited
If smallness of the total package is a criterion,
I'm surprised that you'd take both these lenses.

QuoteOriginally posted by interested_observer Quote
I wanted to go from as wide as possible (given small and lite) to really no longer than 85mm. Beyond that the physical size just grows.
The Voigtlaender 180/4 is only 15% longer than the FA 31 (79mm versus 69mm).
10-18-2013, 06:32 AM   #9
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Michigan
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,207
QuoteOriginally posted by interested_observer Quote
All I am interested in now is to wander around and shoot some interesting images.
How do you go about changing lenses on the run?
I find I have to look around for a park bench or something to sit the lenses on, If I try to do it standing up these days there is too much risk of dropping a lens while I change over.
Last trip I just had a small holster bag with strap with 2 lenses and no strap on the camera, but it is too much to hold the camera in one hand and get the lenses out with the other.
10-18-2013, 06:44 AM   #10
Veteran Member
Andi Lo's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,924
QuoteOriginally posted by wombat2go Quote
How do you go about changing lenses on the run?
I find I have to look around for a park bench or something to sit the lenses on, If I try to do it standing up these days there is too much risk of dropping a lens while I change over.
Last trip I just had a small holster bag with strap with 2 lenses and no strap on the camera, but it is too much to hold the camera in one hand and get the lenses out with the other.
I just put them on the ground
10-18-2013, 08:17 AM   #11
Banned




Join Date: Jan 2009
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 9,675
Well if I want to travel light I wouldn't take any lens to change, just one attached to the camera.
10-18-2013, 08:22 AM   #12
Veteran Member
Andi Lo's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,924
QuoteOriginally posted by RonHendriks1966 Quote
Well if I want to travel light I wouldn't take any lens to change, just one attached to the camera.
Also dual camera A used K10D is cheap!
10-18-2013, 08:55 AM   #13
Veteran Member
carrrlangas's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Joensuu (Finland)
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,761
QuoteOriginally posted by jatrax Quote
DA 21mm Limited f/3.2
F 28mm f/2.8
DA 40mm Limited f/2.8
F 50mm f/1.7
DA 70 mm Limited f/2.4
Oh, I want the 21 and 70 so badly to complete this kit. Might even leave the F28 and F50 at home
10-18-2013, 11:39 AM   #14
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2012
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 696
@Ron and Andi -- am starting to think that two cameras -- a K-01 with the 35mm f/2.4, for walkaround, and my K-30 left in the car with its 55-300mm for airplanes and sports -- might be the simplest and most useful approach.

What do you think? As for the prime on the first camera, this gets into personal choice really fast... I like the field-of-view of the 35mm, but others may prefer a wider angle, like the 21mm. So many choices, so little money!
10-18-2013, 12:01 PM   #15
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Just1MoreDave's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6,340
I think the thread needs lens pictures so here's mine. The Sigma Superwide II 24mm f2.8, Pentax FA 35mm f2, Pentax-F 50mm f1.7 and Pentax-M 120mm f2.8.




I would start with the DA 15/4 if I had money, skip the Sigma, keep the FA 35/2, swap the F 50/1.7 for a DA 70/2.4 and keep the 120.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
apertures, color, f2.8, frame, k-mount, lenses, light, lite, pentax, pentax lens, shoot, size, slr lens

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Small Pentax 67 kit @ a reasonable price Pentakumar Sold Items 6 07-27-2013 06:00 AM
Small prime for general use Jayc5687 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 30 06-08-2013 04:40 AM
D-Lite Kit Wired Flashes, Lighting, and Studio 3 08-22-2012 12:14 PM
small prime suggestions... heatherslightbox Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 13 03-26-2008 04:42 AM
Refining my prime kit regken Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 2 11-09-2007 12:17 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:47 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top