Lens help for low light indoors!!??

craig1024 · 04-09-2008, 09:14 PM

I have my first "real" wedding coming up in a few months and need to buy a new (or two) lens(es). I know I want an f/2.8, but what do you guys and girls use most in focal lengths? I have been looking at the Tamron 17-50mm, the Sigma 18-50mm, and the Tamron 28-75mm. Just so you know, I have a 50mm f/1.4 now, plus some other lenses that are not suitable for indoor weddings.

What do you think about these or give me your own likes and dislikes about your lenses.

ranamar · 04-09-2008, 11:41 PM

Don't forget the DA* 16-50.
It is a great lens, and around here in the Vancouver area, we have had no QC issues that I have heard of. It is an amazing lens even wide open, and gives beautiful colours. It is also weather sealed, but I don't think that will be of much use for a wedding. Don't forget a longer lens for times that you need that extra bit of reach.

**pentagor** · 04-09-2008, 11:55 PM

I think you will be very good with the Tamron 28-75 for a wedding. But do not forget the flash, even if the lens is f/2.8. There will be a lot of movement (like all weddings) and a f/2.8 will not be fast enough, believe me...

craig1024 · 04-10-2008, 12:05 AM

I have a Sigma EF 530 DG Super, so the flash is covered(except I can't find a diffuser for it). The Da*16-50 is out of my price range right now. My perfect bag would have the DA*16-50 and the DA* 50-135, but I just can't do that right now.

I am starting to think, although I really want it, the 28-75 may just not have the wide angle that I want or need.

**pentagor** · 04-10-2008, 12:09 AM

Originally posted by craig1024

I have a Sigma EF 530 DG Super, so the flash is covered(except I can't find a diffuser for it). The Da*16-50 is out of my price range right now. My perfect bag would have the DA*16-50 and the DA* 50-135, but I just can't do that right now.

I am starting to think, although I really want it, the 28-75 may just not have the wide angle that I want or need.

I think, that for wedding you need a zoom, that covers the 30 - 70 range. Changing lenses is not an option at event with a lot of things going on...

If you need to go wider than 28, then maybe the Sigma 17-70. It is not fixed f2.8, but with the flash it will be no problem at all.

craig1024 · 04-10-2008, 12:26 AM

I think a 17-70mm f/2.8 would be perfect. Any such beast out there? I hate using the flash! I would love to either learn how to use the flash properly, or not use it, which is what I try to do now.

**pentagor** · 04-10-2008, 12:36 AM

Originally posted by craig1024

I think a 17-70mm f/2.8 would be perfect. Any such beast out there? I hate using the flash! I would love to either learn how to use the flash properly, or not use it, which is what I try to do now.

Petnax will put a 17-70 f/4, not f/2.8 on the market soon. I don't think that there is a 17-70 f/2.8 on the market right now.

Flash: if you have a P-TTL flash, then try to use it bounced. Of course you would need a white ceiling for that. The other option is to use a diffuser. Either way, you'll need to adjust the exposure compensation to +1/2 or even +1 EV.
When I photograph family events, I use ma Cobra thyristor flash, bounced up. My diffuser is a white piece of paper attached to the flash with a rubber strap. I just have some problems with the exposure settings, since the flash only works in M mode.

04-09-2008, 09:14 PM	#1
craig1024 Inactive Account Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Central Indiana Posts: 109	Lens help for low light indoors!!?? I have my first "real" wedding coming up in a few months and need to buy a new (or two) lens(es). I know I want an f/2.8, but what do you guys and girls use most in focal lengths? I have been looking at the Tamron 17-50mm, the Sigma 18-50mm, and the Tamron 28-75mm. Just so you know, I have a 50mm f/1.4 now, plus some other lenses that are not suitable for indoor weddings. What do you think about these or give me your own likes and dislikes about your lenses.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Low/available light lens : 35 f2 or 50 f1.4/1.7?	kit p. lang	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	18	07-18-2010 06:18 PM
Looking for advice on a low light lens.	LightingGuy	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	15	04-12-2010 05:20 PM
low light lens for K-m?	skoobie	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	4	08-15-2009 07:30 AM
Best lens for low light AF	Russell-Evans	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	17	09-10-2008 07:01 PM
Low Light Lens Options	qdoan	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	44	01-31-2008 07:25 AM

04-09-2008, 11:41 PM	#2
ranamar Forum Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Vancouver, BC Posts: 88	Don't forget the DA* 16-50. It is a great lens, and around here in the Vancouver area, we have had no QC issues that I have heard of. It is an amazing lens even wide open, and gives beautiful colours. It is also weather sealed, but I don't think that will be of much use for a wedding. Don't forget a longer lens for times that you need that extra bit of reach.

04-09-2008, 11:55 PM	#3
pentagor Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia Posts: 495	I think you will be very good with the Tamron 28-75 for a wedding. But do not forget the flash, even if the lens is f/2.8. There will be a lot of movement (like all weddings) and a f/2.8 will not be fast enough, believe me...

04-10-2008, 12:05 AM	#4
craig1024 Inactive Account Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Central Indiana Posts: 109 Original Poster	I have a Sigma EF 530 DG Super, so the flash is covered(except I can't find a diffuser for it). The Da16-50 is out of my price range right now. My perfect bag would have the DA16-50 and the DA* 50-135, but I just can't do that right now. I am starting to think, although I really want it, the 28-75 may just not have the wide angle that I want or need.

04-10-2008, 12:09 AM	#5
pentagor Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia Posts: 495	Originally posted by craig1024 I have a Sigma EF 530 DG Super, so the flash is covered(except I can't find a diffuser for it). The Da16-50 is out of my price range right now. My perfect bag would have the DA16-50 and the DA* 50-135, but I just can't do that right now. I am starting to think, although I really want it, the 28-75 may just not have the wide angle that I want or need. I think, that for wedding you need a zoom, that covers the 30 - 70 range. Changing lenses is not an option at event with a lot of things going on... If you need to go wider than 28, then maybe the Sigma 17-70. It is not fixed f2.8, but with the flash it will be no problem at all.

04-10-2008, 12:26 AM	#6
craig1024 Inactive Account Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Central Indiana Posts: 109 Original Poster	I think a 17-70mm f/2.8 would be perfect. Any such beast out there? I hate using the flash! I would love to either learn how to use the flash properly, or not use it, which is what I try to do now.

04-10-2008, 12:36 AM	#7
pentagor Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia Posts: 495	Originally posted by craig1024 I think a 17-70mm f/2.8 would be perfect. Any such beast out there? I hate using the flash! I would love to either learn how to use the flash properly, or not use it, which is what I try to do now. Petnax will put a 17-70 f/4, not f/2.8 on the market soon. I don't think that there is a 17-70 f/2.8 on the market right now. Flash: if you have a P-TTL flash, then try to use it bounced. Of course you would need a white ceiling for that. The other option is to use a diffuser. Either way, you'll need to adjust the exposure compensation to +1/2 or even +1 EV. When I photograph family events, I use ma Cobra thyristor flash, bounced up. My diffuser is a white piece of paper attached to the flash with a rubber strap. I just have some problems with the exposure settings, since the flash only works in M mode.