Originally posted by Canada_Rockies Peasants, all of you. You should know by now that the only Eastern beer to drink is Dow.
Good lord... the man lives a little over an hour away and talks about Eastern beer with so much better so close at hand.
Personally, I am an incorrigible Kokanee drinker, and have been since long before the slick advertising campaigns started 15 years ago or whatever. To wit, I remember as a young lad buying "a case of fish" off the loading dock at the brewery. That would be sometime in the 60's... If that makes me a peasant, so be it. I'm a miner's kid and a former miner myself, never saw anything wrong with being a peasant - especially when it allowed me to grow up and live in the East Kootenays.
It may not be microbrewery stuff, but when I took leave in Germany a lot of the brews over there tasted agreeably like Kokanee, so it can't be too bad. Even my brothers the beer snobs don't seem to have a problem raiding the fridge when they're over...
Nice to have some spare time once again to enjoy the site and the images. I'd like to compare either of the two lenses in question with my Sigma 17-70, which tends to be my walk around lens. However, the new Pentax 55-300 has my attention at the moment. As Canada Rockies knows, there's a lot of stuff in this area that favours a bit of reach in a lense. Being as most of my photography is in conjunction with hunting, kayaking, backpacking, flyfishing, etc here in the Kootenays, paring the number of lenses, weight, and space required down is a real factor.
Now what was I looking for when I came back here after so many months... oh yeah... slide scanners. Jeez, it's easy to get sidetracked here!