Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
01-24-2014, 08:28 AM   #16
reeftool's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 8,413
Sorry, I missed that.

01-24-2014, 08:56 AM   #17
Veteran Member
crewl1's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 9,797
I did DJ work for weddings for a lot of years and worked with many wedding photogs.

When I got interested in photography I started paying attention to what equipment they were using.

The large majority used two bodies, one with a wide 2.8 zoom (mostly 20ish to 70 on full frame) and the other with a 70-200 2.8 zoom.

The more creative types might also carry a super wide zoom.

Rarely saw anyone with primes on, unless they had multiple shooters.

Most used an external flash bounced up with a Stofen on the camera or available light during the day.

One wedding I did the photog had a team of shooters with wireless flash units up on stands high up throughout the room.
I later saw the pics on his website and the shots were awesome.

My viewpoint is from the reception hall and outdoor ceremony, I don't know what they used in the church.
01-24-2014, 09:16 AM   #18

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bangalore
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,450
Tamron 70-200 is a beautiful but one of my least used lens due to the weight. Most of the time, I pickup one of the prime. However it's just me, if you can handle the weight, 70-200 range would be more versatile for wedding as long as AF co-operates.
01-25-2014, 11:57 AM   #19
Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 161
Ok, here's my two cents:

Tamron 70-200 2.8 (I haven't used this): probably good optically but 1) very big, heavy and 'scary' for people close up, 2) not cheap, 3) leaves you with a focal length gap between 50 and 70. I think you'll find this frustrating.

Sigma 70mm macro (i have used this): superb optics and reasonably small, but as others have said, it sounds like you need a zoom in the longer range. I'd say more or less the same for the other primes mentioned.

Pentax 50-135 2.8 (I haven't used this): Probably perfect for what you want in terms of focal length and optics, but 1) expensive, 2) fears about the AF are understandable - it would be a risk.

So a couple of suggestions which haven't been mentioned:

Sigma 50-150 (old version). This will need to be bought second-hand and is not that easy to get hold of for Pentax, but reviews put it close to the Pentax 50-135 optically and it doesn't have the known AF issues. It's much smaller and lighter than the Tamron 70-200 and will be pretty cheap if you can get hold of it. It also won't leave you with a focal length gap. I haven't used it and am just going off what I have read.

Tamron 28-75 2.8. Ok this doesn't extend your reach as much as the other options but it does get you to the portrait focal length you wanted, doesn't leave a gap after your Tamron 17-50 and won't interrupt your flow as much as a prime because you can quickly zoom back if you need to without changing lenses or bodies. It's also sharp, small and light and fairly cheap.
If you got the 28-75 you could get a Pentax M 75-150 f4 for occasional longer focal length shots - costs virtually nothing and performs well at max aperture. It's manual focus and manual aperture but the push-pull system is quick to use. This will outperform your Sigma 70-300 by a mile - I've compared them.

Happy choosing!

Last edited by jonby; 01-26-2014 at 04:14 PM.
01-25-2014, 12:27 PM   #20
Veteran Member

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,893
My opinion - I don't think the gap between 50 and 70 matters in practice. Use the 50 and crop in those rare instances where you 70 isn't wide enough and 50 has 'extra' stuff in the pic.
01-26-2014, 09:15 AM   #21
Forum Member

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 71
Original Poster
You guys have all given great advice. Right now I'm leading towards the 70-200 because of the utility it will bring and the shots look pretty awesome. I'm definitely going to look into the 50-150, only problem is I have about $600 in Amazon dollars to spend so unless I find a used one on there it's probably going to be a new Tamron. The extra $400 for the Pentax 50-135 just didn't seem justified to me.

  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
70-200, 70mm, da, input, k-mount, lens, light, macro, pentax, pentax lens, sigma, slr lens, sort, tamron, weddings
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Seeking input on a 70-200mm purchase HockeyDad Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 15 09-17-2011 09:21 PM
DA 50-200 vs DA 55-300 vs Vivitar S1 70-210 vs Pentax-A 70-210; Tele-Zoom Comparo PentHassyKon Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 16 04-28-2010 03:40 PM
Anyone have problems with tamron 70-200? sio Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 5 03-04-2009 10:50 AM
A 180 macro Vs a 70-200/2.8- A different perspective.. hrishi Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 12 07-04-2008 07:30 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:57 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]