Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
02-02-2014, 06:25 PM   #61
Pentaxian
panoguy's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Washington, D.C.
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,281
If I *could* start all over again, I'd skip the learning curve of old, long lenses (like the Tamron 300/2.8) and TCs and go right to the Sigma 50-500 or 150-500 OS. Never mind the mirror lenses!

Next, I'd buy the 35mm Ltd. Macro and use that until the shutter on my K20D gave out (don't think it was available when my K10D was new). Skip all that FA Ltd. stuff and the exotic Zeiss and adapted Leitz nonsense. Sorry, but "rendering" is something I prefer to do in my 3D applications, not obsess over in chunks of glass and metal.

So wait... that leaves me with:

DA35mm Macro Ltd.
Sigma 50-500 OS
Oh, and the 10-17 FE for my panos

...huh.

WTF is clogging up my gear closet?? I've got macro lenses, old K-mounts, Russian oddballs, and even medium-format lenses on adapters! Gotta do some spring cleaning.

02-02-2014, 06:30 PM   #62
Pentaxian
tromboads's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbs
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,132
Yes actually let me do this again.

M50 f2.

That'll do
02-02-2014, 07:39 PM   #63
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N. Calif
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,537
16-50
70-200
77
31
10-17
02-02-2014, 09:33 PM   #64
Veteran Member




Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Orleans
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,054
DA 15 mm ltd
DA 21 mm ltd (owned)
FA 31 mm ltd **
DA* 55 mm (to replace my Sigma 50 mm)
FA 77 mm ltd **
DA* 16-50 *** (to replace my DA 16-45)
DA* 50-135 ***

** waiting for mark 2 with HD coating and QS
*** waiting for mark 2 with DC motor

02-02-2014, 09:54 PM - 1 Like   #65
New Member




Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Miramichi, New Brunswick
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6
Oh my goodness, I am the new owner of the 35mm 2.8, nicknamed as" fantastic plastic". It is the cheapest (price wise) lens I have bought, and I did so because Henry was offering it for a wee bit over $100 Canadian if you bought a new DSLR. I had pre-order the new K-3 silver editions...so I really suck my bank account dry...but the lens was a nice deal...I bit the bullet, bought the lens:

To answer the question of if I could start again what would I buy. THIS LENS WOULD BE MY FIRST! I have never had a lens so sharp and so fast and so amazing...Maybe the question begs to be ask...what do I have in my bag...ummm lets see....I own the lens kits..18-55 and 55-200...I own sigma 70mm and Tamron 50-300mm and the Pentax 16-45, (my usually 'walk around partner")...but I have used it since my new love of 35mm. I also have a handful of lens from my SLR film days.

A great lens can take your photography to a new height, a more pro level!! Here is a wee sample of this 35mm's ability

Regards

JA
Attached Images
View Picture EXIF
 Photo 
View Picture EXIF
 Photo 
02-02-2014, 11:55 PM   #66
Pentaxian
tromboads's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbs
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,132
That's a wee bita colour there son :P Dig the Bottom one.

But Shhh already! This thread is about LBA reformists, don't go encouraging us to buy more! :P
02-03-2014, 12:07 AM   #67
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Pasadena, CA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,105
I am pretty happy with what I got with a few minor changes:
16-45mm is on my camera 90% of the time. I find it excellent and very versatile.
55mm F1.8 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar is excellent as well. I do wish it had a bit better contrast, but the lens was $25.
Tokina 80-200mm F3.5-4.5 This lens was a big surprise, the only downside was a large amount of flare.
>> 135mm M F3.5 - I would rather have a preset than a stop down lens.
>>> 200mm F3.5 Vivitar (bright band). This lens is sharp enough for portraits and bokeh-rich shots (nice bokeh), but not for what I was planning to do. It was $19 though.
> Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6, non-HSM. I wish it had sun-star effects and less amber-yellow tint. I can correct the latter in photoshop, I am still figuring out how to get around the former.
>>> 18-55mm DA WR. I am not really using the WR that much and 16mm in 16-45mm is very useful for me.

Number of '>' indicates how likely I am to actually replace it. I am thinking of adding a fast normal prime in 24-40mm range, a longer fast zoom (F4 or F2.8) and maybe swapping the 10-20 for a DA 15mm.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
choice, k-mount, lens, lenses, pentax lens, slr lens, time
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If you were starting over... nanter Pentax DSLR Discussion 49 04-10-2013 10:29 PM
If you were going to escape... alamo5000 General Talk 57 01-05-2013 11:41 AM
If you were to switch systems. What would it be? throndor General Talk 97 02-16-2010 06:54 AM
If you could do it all over?... beaumont Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 64 11-02-2008 09:33 PM
If you could do it all again...? beaumont Digital Processing, Software, and Printing 18 09-10-2008 04:57 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:28 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top