Originally posted by Driline I've always wanted to try the FA 28. Such a nice lens and a great focal length. I had the A 28 for awhile and really liked the IQ.
From what I have read the F 28 is the same optical formula as the A, while the FA is different (fewer elements, if I recall correctly). Some say the F is better than the FA - not sure what "better" is, though. If it is better it must be an amazing lens. Other than a slight softness at 2.8 there is not much to criticise the FA for. I would have a hard time choosing between the 28 and the 43 if I had to.
To stay sort of on-topic, I should update myself:
Originally posted by savoche Mid ninties: 2 lenses
Last half of 2011: Added 4 = 6
2012: Added 7 = 13
2013: Added 6 = 19
First quarter of 2014: Added 3 = 22
Second quarter of 2014: Added 2 = 24
Well, and a Raynox 150 if that counts...
And a K-3, which will hopefully keep me away from the marketplaces for a while
I'm going to have a few weeks off now so maybe I'll get some more time to actually
use those lenses.