Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
03-29-2014, 03:02 PM   #1
Veteran Member
jtkratzer's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Lancaster County, Pa
Posts: 665
24mm on film if I already have a 28?

I have the K28/3.5 and really like it, but since picking up the DA15, I'm curious if a 24 will be close enough on film to give me similar results. I'm seeing varying opinions about going wider than 24 if one already has a 28, but I'm not sure I want to go as far as a 20mm and everything wider than 24 that isn't fisheye starts to get stupid expensive. I like the sub-$150 manual lenses, less so the $600+ options. Anyone have both and lean one way or the other? The 24 I'm looking at is a K24/3.5.

03-29-2014, 03:08 PM   #2
Site Supporter
Sandy Hancock's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Adelaide Hills, South Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,249
24 is considerably wider. Back in my film days I had a 24 (Sigma Ultra-Wide f/2.8) and 28 (Kiron f/2.0). Although the 28 was a better lens I preferred the angle of view of the 24.
03-29-2014, 03:10 PM   #3
Pentaxian
fgaudet's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 726
4mm on the wide end is a lot. Significantly wider
03-29-2014, 03:14 PM   #4
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Oklahoma USA
Posts: 1,475
Absolutely - a 24 is worthwhile. I had a 28-55 and a 17mm. I got the 24/2.8 because it was much cheaper and smaller than the 20mm, if I recall. Oddly, I never really missed having a 20mm, but definitely missed having something between 28 and 17 before I got the 24.

03-29-2014, 03:17 PM   #5
Site Supporter
rbefly's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Denver, Colorado
Photos: Albums
Posts: 2,030
Me, Too!

Hi, jt, Sandy, fgaudet and tibbitts nailed it, I've had the same experience, both with film and digital. My 24mm is a standby, less so the 28mm, especially if I'm also bringing a 35mm.
Those four mm's seem like as much, if not more, than the 7mm difference between 28-35, if that makes any sense.
So, if you can find a good (or, great!) 24mm for under $200, grab it! You won't look back, film or digital.
JMO,
Ron
03-29-2014, 03:18 PM - 1 Like   #6
Moderator PEG Judges
Kerrowdown's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Highlands of Scotland.
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 30,657
QuoteOriginally posted by jtkratzer Quote
24mm on film if I already have a 28?
Of course it's worth it and if they did a 26 mm that would be worth getting too, LBA Rules.
03-29-2014, 03:58 PM   #7
Senior Member
johnha's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lancashire, UK
Posts: 250
As others have said, 24mm on film is quite different to 28mm, it depends on how you want to work. Having several 28mm lenses myself (long story), and not wanting to spend a fortune on a 20mm 'for film' lens, I opted for an FA20-35/4 zoom - based on the idea it was also usable on digital and my AF film bodies.
03-29-2014, 04:34 PM   #8
Veteran Member
jtkratzer's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Lancaster County, Pa
Posts: 665
Original Poster
Thanks for the insight. I love the 15 and the K24 or 24 in general is the closest FOV I can get on film that isn't an exotic and expensive lens. At some point, I'll have to get the tripod out and compare a film 24mm and digital DA15 shot comparison.

03-29-2014, 04:44 PM   #9
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern California
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,181
A24/2.8 and FA20-35/4 are both good. Never tried the K24.
03-29-2014, 07:16 PM   #10
Site Supporter
jimr-pdx's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: 1hr north of PDX
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,480
I can still recall the experience the first time I used a 24mm lens and marveled at how wide the view was compared to 28mm. That was about 30 years ago, so the fact that it still hits me shows what a difference I felt it was!
03-29-2014, 07:29 PM   #11
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 394
Absolutely. I have the A24 2.8 and the K28/3.5 both, and it is definitely worth it.
03-30-2014, 12:13 AM   #12
Pentaxian




Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bangalore
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,435
My 24mm lenses remains unused as I don't feel like carrying extra lens just for a bit of wideness. I somehow find 28/2 more versatile both for landscape & the street shots instead of carrying two lenses.
03-30-2014, 03:35 AM   #13
Pentaxian
Jonathan Mac's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 3,920
I use 24mm less because my 24mm (Sigma AF version) is not all-manual, so I don't get the full manual-gear experience from it, and 28mm is wide enough for almost everything I want. Having said that, it's useful to have and I use wide-angle lenses more than I used to and I really need to get out a learn how to get the best from the Sigma.
03-30-2014, 05:28 AM   #14
Senior Member




Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Photos: Albums
Posts: 211
I have the M20mm and the M28mm and the M35mm....I haven't used the 28 for a couple of years. The 20 is in use as is the 35. I've just bought and am waiting for it to arrive, a Sigma 24AF. I think it will work a little better than the 28....on the K5. At least I hope so.
03-30-2014, 07:53 AM   #15
Veteran Member
jtkratzer's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Lancaster County, Pa
Posts: 665
Original Poster
I use the 31 and 77 on manual film bodies, but their focus throw is pretty decent for AF lenses. I bought a K24/3.5. We'll see how it goes on my recently CLAed bodies if the post office figures out the difference between their assess and elbows. Priority mail package on its 10th day in transit going from TN to VA. I didn't realize they reverted to the Pony Express.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
film, k-mount, pentax lens, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need a portrait lens for my K-7, ...but do I already have one that will work. SherryO Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 20 01-18-2014 04:37 PM
Should I get A50/1.2 if I already have Voigtlander 58/1.4 chesebert Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 6 04-17-2013 06:50 AM
Pentax A24 F2.8 worth buying if I have A24-50 F4 already? PPPPPP42 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 9 09-23-2012 05:40 AM
K-01 worth buying if you already have K-5 in the family? dartagnon Pentax K-01 14 06-25-2012 01:25 AM
If I have a manual lens if the rest still calcuated for me? justtakingpics Pentax DSLR Discussion 2 04-24-2010 06:35 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:46 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top