Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
04-12-2014, 11:46 AM   #1
Forum Member




Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 86
Need help choosing 35mm Lens

I currently have a K5. I will be upgrading to a K3 in August.

I'm looking for a GOOD 35mm lens. I need this for landscape & portraits mostly.
Does anyone have experience owning multiple that they can share with me?

Pentax 31mm F1.8
Pentax 35mm F2.4
Sigma 35mm F1.4

I really like what I'm seeing from the Sigma lens. But is it worth the cost difference over the other two?

04-12-2014, 12:27 PM   #2
Site Supporter
jatrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,770
Only if you need f/1.4

Also consider the Pentax 35 f/2.8 limited
04-12-2014, 12:34 PM   #3
Pentaxian
Na Horuk's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Slovenia, probably
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,867
Pentax FA 31mm f1.8 limited
Pentax DA 35mm f2.8 limited macro
Pentax FA 35mm f2.0
Pentax DA 35mm f2.4
I think that is the correct order. The rest depends on your budget and needs (macro?)
Although I would say 35mm for portraits is a little wide.
04-12-2014, 12:41 PM   #4
Forum Member




Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 86
Original Poster
True. 35mm can be a bit wide. But it won't be my full time portrait lens.
It'll be used more when I need to capture the environment along with the portrait.

I'm looking for a lens that is extremely sharp.
You feel that the pentax 31mm Limited is as sharp as the Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art?

04-12-2014, 12:55 PM   #5
Kiwi Pentaxian
NZ_Ross's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Timaru
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,264
If you after 35mm - have you considered the Zeiss ZK 35/2. It is a stunning lens, meters on the K5. The disadvantage of the Zeiss 35 is - it is manual focus.

I use mine mainly for landscapes, although there is one portrait.

I had a Pentax 35/2.8 Limited Macro which I really liked, but I sold it as I was never using it - I would always reach for the Zeiss every time I wanted 35mm.

I have also used a friends Pentax FA31 and that is also a very good lens. If AF was important to me I think I would take the FA31.
04-12-2014, 01:05 PM   #6
Pentaxian
Na Horuk's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Slovenia, probably
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,867
I think the FA 31mm ltd and DA 35mm macro limited are both very sharp, with the FA and DA not far behind. I doubt any of these would be "not sharp enough"
04-12-2014, 01:07 PM   #7
Senior Member
sinjin's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 242
I had the DA 35 f2.4 and 35 f2.8 limited at the same time. Both excellent but sold the former because I like to shoot macro and the latter is definitely a step up in all regards save one. The DA 35 f2.4 is easier to focus at 'normal' distances. That being said I've found autofocus on the limited to be very good. Anyhow, you said sharpness was key; the limited is insanely sharp in my opinion. I'm constantly amazed by the detail and micro contrast it produces.
04-12-2014, 01:21 PM   #8
Site Supporter
wtlwdwgn's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Billings, MT
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 9,333
DA 35mm f/2.8 Limited Macro.

04-12-2014, 01:42 PM   #9
Forum Member




Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 86
Original Poster
Most people seem to prefer the Pentax 31mm.
I'll definitely give it a look.

Perhaps I'll rent one for a few days and see how I get along with it.
04-12-2014, 02:06 PM   #10
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern California
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,181
You need to decide which lens renders the images the way you prefer. So keep looking at photos from the lenses. The PPG is still my favorite site for this.

This is a good place to save money. The DA35/2.4 is actually quite good. Great wide open. As good or better than the FA35 that preceded it. I'd even pick it over the Sigma 35/1.4, but this is where personal preference comes in.



I think the FA31 is unquestionably the "best" lens here, but it's also the most unique. So you have to be ready to deal with its unique rendering characteristics. When it's impossible to tell exactly where nearby objects transition from being In-Focus to Out-Of-Focus, your images don't look the same. Want a lens that's nearly the opposite? Try the FA*24 - the most abrupt transition to OOF I've seen.

The FA31 is the only lens you're considering that's a modern classic. But you don't have to like it - really!


I own or have owned all the Pentax lenses I've mentioned.
04-12-2014, 02:43 PM   #11
hcc
Pentaxian
hcc's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,531
+1 for the FA31mm.
04-12-2014, 03:02 PM   #12
Site Supporter
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 27,457
FA 35/2 ...almost never leaves my camera. 'Nuff said.

Fotostevia on Flickr: Pentax-FA 35/2

PM me if you are interested in a test drive.


Steve

Last edited by stevebrot; 04-12-2014 at 03:08 PM.
04-12-2014, 03:20 PM   #13
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Flyover America
Posts: 4,475
QuoteOriginally posted by stevebrot Quote
FA 35/2 ...almost never leaves my camera. 'Nuff said.
Yep.

For a while I had both the FA 35/2 and the Zeiss ZK 35/2.
At most apertures you couldn't see the difference but at 2.8 or wider the Pentax was clearly sharper.
04-12-2014, 03:32 PM   #14
Pentaxian




Join Date: Nov 2011
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,735
QuoteOriginally posted by wildman Quote
For a while I had both the FA 35/2 and the Zeiss ZK 35/2.
At ... 2.8 or wider the Pentax was clearly sharper.
Interesting: This is opposite from the tests on Optyczne/Lenstip.
My ZK 35/2 is certainly very sharp at f/2, in the focus plane of course!
04-12-2014, 03:44 PM   #15
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern California
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,181
The photos from the Zeiss certainly look better than those from the FA35. But neither one is a dog. That's why I think the nearly identical DA35/2.4 is still a good option.

I'd say the Zeiss has more traditional rendering than the FA31, however. Which could be either good or bad, depending on what you want.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
35mm, focus, focus issues, k-mount, lens, pentax, pentax lens, reviews, sigma, sigma 35mm, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New and need help choosing a zoom lens drRae Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 10 01-15-2013 04:20 PM
need help choosing a lens Jinxed Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 9 12-29-2011 04:20 AM
Need help choosing a lens... Saxplayer1004 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 6 09-18-2010 07:27 PM
Need Help choosing new lens guitarjoe2 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 5 06-10-2010 05:55 AM
Need help choosing a long lens Heinrich Lohmann Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 3 12-26-2006 06:00 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:39 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top