Last year I purchased a Voigtlander Ultron 40mm f2.0 SLii second hand, but in "as new" condition, for a good price. I initially bought the lens to have a compact travel-camera kit, to bring along for a vacation in Southern Europe. I also use the lens for general landscape shooting and low light situations. Relying on the focussing confirmation of the K20D, I have had quite mixed results with regards to focus ( I probably should have changed to a focussing screen better suited for manual focus...). Anyway, I am mostly very happy with the tiny Voigtlander and the images it produces. It is very sharp across the frame already at f2.0, and is very suitable for landscape.
I have never tried a FA 43/1.9, I only know its reputation. Would there be much to gain with getting a FA 43 instead of the Voigtlander, apart from autofocus?
I appreciate any advice on this matter!
Regards
Bjørn
Last edited by bjolester; 04-23-2014 at 04:05 PM.