Originally posted by NaClH2O Bucking the trend
I'd say that with the 16-45 and the 55-300 you have pretty much the full range of focal lengths required, unless of course you want to go much wider. I would think carefully about bringing a fast prime, like the FA50mm F1.4. I'm sure there will be some low light photo ops that a light weight fast prime would be ideal for. I think there will be more opportunity to use a low light lens instead of a macro.
NaCl( a 'fast 50' is the way to go)H2O
I would agree with the fast lens as the 3rd one, IMO it would be indispensible - especially if you don't have a tripod.
I think I would find it difficult to chose between the 50 and a 35/2, or even a 31mm for that matter (if I had the budget!). probably depends on your fov preference, subject matter and photo stitching capabilities. Maybe even a 50/2.8 macro ?
I think I would go for a 35/2, it's fast enough, light enough, and it will have similar perception to eyesight and will be versatile. You could use it indoors more easily than the 50 also (rememeber the 16-45 can only be used with the pop-up flash from ~24-45mm, assuming you won't be taking a flashgun). hhmmm just wish I had one !
Last edited by bladerunneruk; 05-10-2008 at 03:06 PM.
Reason: typo