I know that there are many factors that make a lens outstanding - color rendition, bokeh, macro capability, all-around use, etc.
But today I want to talk about just ONE factor and that is SHARPNESS. Given today's very capable sensors, such as those in the K5IIs or the K-3, what lens will give the sharpest renditions that can match these hi-def sensors?
It's almost a given that a prime (non-zoom) lens will come out on top almost every time, probably because there are fewer lens elements, and the exact parameters can be controlled for the one focal length - no compromises needed over a zoom range.
For quite a while, I've gotten by with only one prime lens. That was the SMC-FA 50mm f1/4. For what I do (free-lance writing and photography in the firearms field), it was pretty good in photographing handguns close-up. Stopped down to f/8, and used with a lens hood on a tripod, it was pretty darn sharp. It also made a good portrait lens, being the equivalent of a 75mm full-frame. Sharpness didn't count as much there, but the focal length was almost ideal. Still, I considered it the sharpest lens I had - all the others were zooms (18-55, 18-135 and 18-250).
And then I won a SMC-DA 35mm f/2.8 Macro Limited in an on-line auction. Oh, boy, was this lens SHARP. It suited me perfectly for taking closeups of anything, and it worked wonderfully for photographing firearms. One example is illustrated below.
I decided I also wanted to try it out for portraiture. I used it to photograph a lady who was my neighbor when I was a kid. I shot the pic below in her living room, using a few lamps scattered around the room for natural light, no flash employed. I think it was marvelously sharp for that purpose as well.
So in MY kit, that 35mm Macro Ltd reigns supreme for sharpness.
What Pentax lens do YOU think, based on actual experience, gives the best results for just this one factor -
sharpness?
John
PENTAX : PENTAX Photo Gallery artist page