Originally posted by Rondec
. It just isn't great to use indoors, because it is slow and edges aren't sharp till at least f5.6.
At that length, f4-5.6 isn't actually that slow. At 5.6 I can shoot handheld indoors in a decently lit room without problem. On a lens that wide, shooting at 1/30 is actually pretty steady (with SR off, even). I actually find the 15mm to be a bit wide for a lot of landscapes, since it pushed the background way back (i.e. it turns mountains into molehills). I generally use it for "smaller" landscapes, utilizing its close focal distance to emphasize foregrounds. Generally I use it for interesting shots, since it makes otherwise normal shots, into odd creative shots.
Originally posted by Michaelina2
Christmas is almost here. Put out the word... you might get some help...
Here's hoping, though most of my relations blanch every Christmas when I state "so, [insert loved one's name], I've had my eye on [insert bit of camera kit]..." To my family I might as well be collecting useless alien artifacts. That said, I'm not 100% sure about the length of the 77, especially for the premium. 155mm, on APS-C, seems a bit oddball. But then again, looking at the recent poll, and the shots here... I probably wouldn't be sad if I "settled" for it.
Originally posted by Michaelina2
Time for a new gf...?
I've had her longer than I've been shooting, so I suppose she wins.