Originally posted by Sandy Hancock Complete?
No limiteds, no f/1.2 glass, no macro, and way too many zooms covering similar ranges.
You still have a long way to go
The fastest I had was f/1.4 and it didn't do it for me. I am likely going to sell my Tamron 17-50 later on, but not right now and my Sigma 70-300 along with the older F zooms that get no use. I haven't really done much in macro stuff, though I may use what I have with extension tubes, and as for limiteds, from my experience with primes so far I don't think I could justify the cost/benefit ratio for myself with my type of shooting.
It's a good thing no one knows where I am now because I would say that they would come after me with pitchforks and torches because I don't see the appeal of the limiteds...
---------- Post added 11-07-14 at 04:23 PM ----------
Originally posted by monochrome I goofed around with various spreadsheets I've kept over the last 15 years. I quit coutning somewhere around 200.
Recently I changed my approach entirely. Since I got the K-3 I really haven't used film cameras or manual focus lenses much (about a year now) so I executed the dream plan (+1).
FA31/1.8 | FA43/1.9 | FA50/2.8 Macro | FA77/1.8 | DA55~300 (candidate for replacement come spring)
DA40/2.8 Limited (perma-mounted on the K-01)
Aside from a long lens or a FF zoom and the 1.4x TC I think I'm fully covered and it all fits in one shoulder bag.
My next lens might just be a Coronado solar telescope.