Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
05-21-2008, 07:59 AM   #1
Veteran Member
kuuan's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austria
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 401
how much better Sigma 17-70 than Tamron 18-200?

In the common range, how much improvement is the Sigma 17-70 over the tamron 18-200?
Contrast, distortion, color rendition, vignetting?

And is it really wider?

thank you for any answwer,

Andreas

05-21-2008, 08:23 AM   #2
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT / NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 822
I havent checked the 18-200 but I can tell you I highly doubt a telephoto zoom covering that much of a range (18-200) could be as good as a shorter coverage.

Coming back to the 17-70, it seems like a very decent lens with a nice coverage. It is one of my possible kit lens replacement.
05-21-2008, 11:01 AM   #3
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 976
It's also significantly faster than the ultrazoom.

Usually ultrazooms are bad, there are occasional exceptions. I believe most people prefer the 18-250 over the 18-200.

I use a combination of a Sigma 17-70 and Tamron 70-300 myself. This gets me much more speed at the wide end.
05-21-2008, 01:59 PM   #4
Site Supporter
Bramela's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newcastle Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,281
I am not familiar with the telezoom but I have the 17-70 and to be sure it is a great lens. Leave it on the camera as a walkabout everyday lens and you will be more than pleased with the results.

05-22-2008, 07:24 AM   #5
Veteran Member
kuuan's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austria
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 401
Original Poster
thank you very much everybody for your answers.

yes, the Sigm,a should be better, but the thing is:

I already have the Tamron 18-200, had bought it used together with my Pentax *istDs, both in like new condition, the set for a very good price.

I also have a small range of old manual lenses, mostly M42 Takumars and the IQ I get from those is SO much better than what I get from the Tamron which I therefore soon stopped using.

The reason I asked how it compares to the Sigma: the store where I bought my camera + the Tamron also has a used Sigma 17-70 for almost the same price they sold the Tamron for and I still could try to exchange it. However they might not want to and I am not sure if I should try to, because: is the Sigma 17-70 really a step up big enough to satisfy me?

Not wanting to spend the big bucks but aiming for better IQ I am more drawn towards the Tamron 17-50 than to the Sigma, also for being faster. ( I am more of a wide shooter anyway, could get some tele range zoom later, and I am sure I could sell the Tamron for the price I bought it for, so no need to beg for an exchange )
I should refrace my question:

Tamron 17-50 Vs Sigma 17-70 ?

besides the missing range, is the Tamron a clear winner?

or is there any other budget contestant that offers good IQ in the range from min 17mm to min 50mm or more?
thank you so much for your insight,
Andreas
05-23-2008, 07:27 PM   #6
Senior Member
Mikhail's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: York Region, ON
Posts: 277
Don't know how it compares to the Tamron but what about the Sigma 18-200mm?
Check this out.

Found on pbase.com

Thanks
05-23-2008, 08:21 PM   #7
Veteran Member




Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brazil
Posts: 377
Folks say the Tamron is not as good in contrasts, sharpness and colors. I don't know, all I can say is the 17-70mm is like the DA18-55 on steroids, with all it's goodness and much more.
05-23-2008, 09:16 PM   #8
Pentaxian
fearview's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jakarta
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,067
i dont think its not fair comparison between two of them.. one is covering short to medium and the other is a 'clean sweep' all focal lens..

the last one i think must be have something to sacrifice in picture quality..

05-26-2008, 06:42 AM   #9
Veteran Member
kuuan's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austria
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 401
Original Poster
thank you everybody very much for your input, you are all very kind and helpful.

I went back to the shop today. They had a used Sigma 17-70 and a used Pentax 16-45 f4. Tammy 18-250 and Tammy 17-50 they only had new which would have meant adding another 300 + USD in exchange for the Tammy 18-200 which I had bought used from them and I did not want to spend that much.

I did fast and dirty comparison shots of the three, that is tammy 18-200, Pentax 16-45 and Sigma 17-70 wide open and at f8 at their widest focal lenght and at about 70mm ( 45 mm on the Pentax )

From what I could tell reviewing the photos, above all corner performance, on the camera's LCD my conclusion was:

At their resp. widest focal point the the Sigma is the sharpest, specially at the corners. The biggest difference was to be seen at the widest end and wide open where the Tamron 18-200 really looked quite bad and the Sigma at f2.8 still won over the Pentax at f4.


I got the Sigma 17-70, it won over the Pentax 16-45 for being faster and longer with at least comparable IQ. I did have to pay about 50USD for the exchange but I am very happy because the improvement in IQ is obvious.

Would there also have been a used Tamron 18-250 I could have taken instead the decision indeed would have been very difficult. I had checked sample images on the net and amazingly but truly the Tammy 18-250 does compete with the Sigma 17-70 in IQ. But as I like shooting street = wide angle and at low light the Sigma may well be the better choice for me anyway, I am very happy with the lens!

Also to mention that the auto focus of the Sigma is much smoother, faster and less noisy that that of the Tamron 18-200 ( no idea how these compare to those of the 18-250 )
thank you,
Andreas

Last edited by kuuan; 05-27-2008 at 03:33 AM.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
k-mount, pentax lens, sigma, slr lens, tamron
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tamron 70-200 f2.8 vs Sigma 70-200 f2.8 In Low Light Christopher M.W.T Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 8 11-23-2009 03:57 PM
Pentax 50-200 vs. Sigma 28-200 (vs. Tamron 70-300) shefaet Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 7 11-24-2007 10:44 PM
Tamron 18-200 vs Sigma 18-200 raider Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 4 07-13-2007 03:28 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:38 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top