Originally posted by Driline Just another rubbish picture to contribute...shot with a rubbish 200 hundred dollar Tokina F4 100-300 manual zoom lens.....
Looks like you pelican is dropping something on the Nikon guy below or ?
---------- Post added 03-10-16 at 21:15 ----------
Originally posted by normhead I'd like to see a comparison between a 610 and 150-600 and a K-3 and 150-450, which ends up being a good lens or good body kind of comparison.
Now you have folks who complain about frame rate and buffer sizes for full frames (see other threads of complains about K1 buffer size). I'm long to understand, but I finally get it... Fast apsc camera + prime at least 1 stop faster than the FF lens, has several advantages over full frame and slower long zoom: sharpness of the zoom at 600m isn't matching that of a prime lens having half the weight and size, and full frame + 150-600 zoom is bulkier, and it is more expensive and FF buffers get clogged faster. So, unless considering a $5K+ camera such as D5 or 1D, the second best alternative is to get an apsc Dslr in the league of the K3.