Originally posted by deudeu Thanks guys, I think that I am starting to understand this hyperfocal business.
Just one important question: Does the fact that we are using a small sensor have any impact on the hyperfocal distance?
I don't understand everything about optics but I am guessing that it shouldn't have any consequence, since the DOF depends on the lens and aperture. For instance, my 28mm has a greater DOF on my small sensor than a 42mm would have on a FF (at a given aperture of course), right? If I am wrong and someone can explain to me why, I would be very grateful.
Yes, there is a difference caused by the sensor size. Hyperfocal distance assumes a certain circle of confusion ( the size of the blur from a single point object ), and that depends on the enlargement ratio. For the M lenses, the circle of confusion was based on an 8x10 inch print viewed from a normal viewing distance (10 inches??), as were all the hyperfocal calculations in those days. With the smaller sensor size, for the same subject size, you need to enlarge your image 1.5x as much: 12x15 inches. So the circle of confusion on the sensor is exactly the same, but when you enlarge the image for viewing and/or printing, the circle of confusion will be half again as large.
Quote:
And one not as important question:
Is Hyperfocal mode what is used for disposable cameras and all of those old film P&S? I think i remember some of them said autofocus on them, but i don't remember ever hearing any noise or anything that hinted that something was going on with the lens.
The disposables depend on the hyperfocal distance, as the lens is fixed focus. It should be noted that disposable cameras are designed for the casual user, and enlargements beyond 4x6 inches are not often requested by the usual users of these cameras.