So for a walkaround, how does my most expensive lens compare to my cheapest lens? I guess at f8 all lenses are good...
First is my most expensive lens. Not expensive for most of you, but I had to sell a bass guitar to buy my Sigma 30mm f/1.4 Art. It wasn't an expensive bass so I thought I would only be able to afford the older version. In the end I found an Art used for 309 dollars and jumped at the opportunity - I liked the IQ better from my comparisons, and the much improved MFD compared to the older version had me lusting for it.
After that I found a Tokina 24mm f/2.8 MC (with A contacts)* for 19 dollars shipped and also jumped at the opportunity. Let's see how it fares.
Not too bad eh? Both have linear polarizers on - a Hoya on the Tokina and a Nikon on the Sigma (which is also supposedly made by Hoya). I applied basically the same PP to both.
Of course the Tokina is worth a bit more than 19 dollars, and it's not the cheapest lens I bought - just the cheapest I have kept... still, I don't regret buying the Sigma at all - it goes down to f/1.4 which is very sharp, and helps a lot when I love to use my K10D as much as possible, and the wide aperture helps to keep the ISO low. The Sigma is also quite a bit more flare resistant and renders in a very unique way. But as you see, the Tokina is no slouch... I'm keeping both
especially considering how naturally easy to use the 24mm focal length is on APS-C. A true delight to use not just because the lens is quite good, but because of the FL as well.
*Upon receipt I saw that this Tokina is absolutely identical to the Cosina 24mm f/2.8 that I had gotten just a few months earlier - down to the color of the coatings. Still, one now stays in the K-S1 bag for family outings that is at home, the other stays in my K10D bag that stays at work or in my car (during evenings)... for 19 dollars I don't feel bad having two
---------- Post added 07-27-17 at 01:36 PM ----------
More with the Sigma 30 1.4 Art...
More with the Tokina MC 24 2.8...