Originally posted by ZombieArmy Went on a walk with my trusty Takumar Bayonet 135 f/2.5 today.
The stitch looks awesome. The heron also looks very good.
There's nothing wrong with that lens (Takumar Bayonet 135 2.5). I had it, got the A 135 2.8, didn't think it was an improvement, so I sold it and got the Takumar Bayonet 135 2.8 (basically the same lens, perhaps the coatings were improved a bit since the 2.8 is newer). Those Takumar 135 K-mount lenses remind me a bit of the classic K 135 2.5 in their rendering. I know it's not the same optical formula but the pictures look somewhat similar to me. It's always been a very underrated lens I think.
Another underrated lens is the Cosina/Vivitar/Tokina 24mm f/2.8 - yes Tokina used to make their own 24 2.8 but they later rebadged the Cosina as Tokina. I should know, I own both! They're exactly the same lens, with a bit of copy variation of course, but everything looks the same down to the reflections of the coatings. The serial number on the Vivitar starts with 9 and not 37 - so Vivitar is the manufacturer, not Cosina. It even got sold as a Carl Zeiss lens
(Carl Zeiss Jena, that is... another proof it's a Cosina design, Carl Zeiss never badged a Tokina lens).
It was one of the lenses I took on a lunch walk today, hoping that there were still some fall colors out there. This is the Tokina branded lens, the Vivitar is in the K-S1 lens (yes that's how much I like it, I have one on each bag, ahaha - they sell for so cheap so why not? I paid 19 dollars on the Tokina and someone was selling the Vivitar in the forums for 30 dollars and it took a while to sell! I have no idea why...)